Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH e2fsprogs] tune2fs: touch the device node after setting the label via ioctl
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:13:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923171357.GD6239@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923132223.3355764-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

[cc linux-fsdevel]

On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 09:22:23PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
> When the file system is mounted, tune2fs sets the label through
> FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL, which updates the label without touching the
> mtime of the device node.  Consumers such as blkid use that mtime
> to validate their cached superblock information, so the old label
> can still be returned right after the change:
> 
>   blkid -s LABEL /dev/sdb    # gets "old" and caches it
>   tune2fs -L new /dev/sdb    # online path, node mtime unchanged
>   blkid -s LABEL /dev/sdb    # still gets "old" within 2s
> 
> The offline path is unaffected because writing the superblock
> through the device node updates its mtime as a side effect.  The
> ioctl path has no such side effect, so add an explicit utime() on
> the device after a successful FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL.
> 
> The return value is ignored; if the touch fails, the behavior is
> no worse than before.
> 
> Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/arKZu30pMe0ZavVA@mit.edu
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  misc/tune2fs.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/misc/tune2fs.c b/misc/tune2fs.c
> index 2d85fb704e15..87b8e6830bb9 100644
> --- a/misc/tune2fs.c
> +++ b/misc/tune2fs.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ extern int optind;
>  #endif
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <time.h>
> +#include <utime.h>
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <sys/types.h>
>  #include <libgen.h>
> @@ -3167,6 +3168,14 @@ static int handle_fslabel(int setlabel)
>  		return 1;
>  	}
>  	close(fd);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL does not touch the device mtime that
> +	 * blkid uses to validate its cache; touch the device so
> +	 * mtime-based consumers see the change.
> +	 */
> +	utime(device_name, NULL);

For everyone on fsdevel who might be seeing this for the first time,
there was a problem report in which it was discovered that the libblkid
cache invalidates its knowledge if something updates the block device
mtime.  This is done whenever userspace tools update a block device
(e.g. mkfs) but not done by the kernel when it rewrites the primary
superblock (e.g. FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL).

This patch fixes tune2fs to add the missing mtime update, but I think
a better way to solve this is to fix the ~8 or so implementations inside
the kernel.  And maybe the FS_IOC_SETFSUUID implementations too.

A bigger question, then, is whether filesystems should bump mtime /any/
time they update their own superblock?  There aren't any published specs
mandating this behavior by the kernel, but I suppose it falls under
"someone observed a behavior and started relying on it" :P

Thoughts?

--D

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20260920094137.2749428-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com/

> +
>  	return 0;
>  #else
>  	return -1;
> -- 
> 2.43.7
> 
> 

           reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20260923132223.3355764-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260923171357.GD6239@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox