From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH e2fsprogs] tune2fs: touch the device node after setting the label via ioctl
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:13:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923171357.GD6239@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923132223.3355764-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
[cc linux-fsdevel]
On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 09:22:23PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
> When the file system is mounted, tune2fs sets the label through
> FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL, which updates the label without touching the
> mtime of the device node. Consumers such as blkid use that mtime
> to validate their cached superblock information, so the old label
> can still be returned right after the change:
>
> blkid -s LABEL /dev/sdb # gets "old" and caches it
> tune2fs -L new /dev/sdb # online path, node mtime unchanged
> blkid -s LABEL /dev/sdb # still gets "old" within 2s
>
> The offline path is unaffected because writing the superblock
> through the device node updates its mtime as a side effect. The
> ioctl path has no such side effect, so add an explicit utime() on
> the device after a successful FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL.
>
> The return value is ignored; if the touch fails, the behavior is
> no worse than before.
>
> Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/arKZu30pMe0ZavVA@mit.edu
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> misc/tune2fs.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/misc/tune2fs.c b/misc/tune2fs.c
> index 2d85fb704e15..87b8e6830bb9 100644
> --- a/misc/tune2fs.c
> +++ b/misc/tune2fs.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ extern int optind;
> #endif
> #include <string.h>
> #include <time.h>
> +#include <utime.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <libgen.h>
> @@ -3167,6 +3168,14 @@ static int handle_fslabel(int setlabel)
> return 1;
> }
> close(fd);
> +
> + /*
> + * FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL does not touch the device mtime that
> + * blkid uses to validate its cache; touch the device so
> + * mtime-based consumers see the change.
> + */
> + utime(device_name, NULL);
For everyone on fsdevel who might be seeing this for the first time,
there was a problem report in which it was discovered that the libblkid
cache invalidates its knowledge if something updates the block device
mtime. This is done whenever userspace tools update a block device
(e.g. mkfs) but not done by the kernel when it rewrites the primary
superblock (e.g. FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL).
This patch fixes tune2fs to add the missing mtime update, but I think
a better way to solve this is to fix the ~8 or so implementations inside
the kernel. And maybe the FS_IOC_SETFSUUID implementations too.
A bigger question, then, is whether filesystems should bump mtime /any/
time they update their own superblock? There aren't any published specs
mandating this behavior by the kernel, but I suppose it falls under
"someone observed a behavior and started relying on it" :P
Thoughts?
--D
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20260920094137.2749428-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com/
> +
> return 0;
> #else
> return -1;
> --
> 2.43.7
>
>
parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20260923132223.3355764-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923171357.GD6239@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox