From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5B148EC9D; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 20:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790281791; cv=none; b=Df5konhTo+KnShXwMGH+ctjRBB8MgnL5Q6lbRmET9VkWu5Mm8BEytPaND7UT1KwgiZ1h/+/sqc4kH93ZUgFjGSecPmCjw9pC2bdZGotZc0TMd4HydTBO1HBtp6j0Kb4NFNb0yLvh1BvtWjIurR55otB9q0zenCob/6S/hvks+Ds= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790281791; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YVcQXet+amcUuSTnauf8aYPPaPtno5fCaktlsl8cZcQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PfoKaRH4pSCJqMrdM8syRJ94u5vxkFczDIrLdZkhFPzQmJbL7MUvr99B794YSgpG2p/Evx5S7uYCXlibb5pc5/SE/vONZdWuUYEyYVMIXOI88SI2IBedxeCVUjSbnruVx/IAWSOdSTqlvOmUHN1qH1qDnJ06vysTRwfOpekCyHY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NdPG0sMc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NdPG0sMc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 2F6771F00893; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 20:29:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790281787; bh=O4ao1Vy3Mhec4U7W72ai93OuuL3QZUyU4pVR57mkens=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=NdPG0sMcYQ4rjFRFOmRrICDHSk8DiLBRE694iFRW3izUQ+LFnYEaDMDxSrx1Wn0JX Trgbtzamu8MPB/kJXAZl4UC2tNbfDEY7jkLEuOR38UemQTjWaTo3fENMcjRrttvpGo bCGNe/N4U7/PIHxEoicK6NJWl1jyQel4Ff/MFTNfDTtrNvOrNmL7pZ3cdvZgrn7NSq CG9sAIbpbTm5TsIUqqvbK1rIZ4M6y/Vb9mlWL6gDN9e+fKrlZixBpdKVJKRB7q5g5f fzyIKbJelN67/JmPYjfV+vY4p+Co0zOzTeHQo1C9IE1RdZMJzHswLssKercPXzG2g0 gQI51Alq82n3g== Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 13:29:46 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Carlos Maiolino , Jens Axboe , Christian Brauner , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] block: export fs_bio_integrity_verify Message-ID: <20260924202946.GZ2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20260924100032.2733101-1-hch@lst.de> <20260924100032.2733101-2-hch@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260924100032.2733101-2-hch@lst.de> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 11:59:33AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > From: Damien Le Moal > > XFS will need to call this in the iomap_write_ops.read_folio_range > implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig I'm not the arbiter of exports, but to me this looks ok, Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" --D > --- > block/bio-integrity-fs.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/block/bio-integrity-fs.c b/block/bio-integrity-fs.c > index c8e91ada8ca6..20d0a3d52932 100644 > --- a/block/bio-integrity-fs.c > +++ b/block/bio-integrity-fs.c > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ int fs_bio_integrity_verify(struct bio *bio, struct bvec_iter *data_iter) > bio_integrity_bytes(bi, data_iter->bi_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT); > return blk_status_to_errno(bio_integrity_verify(bio, data_iter)); > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fs_bio_integrity_verify); > > static int __init fs_bio_integrity_init(void) > { > -- > 2.53.0 > >