Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	 Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	 "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 1/8] fs: refuse fspick() on internal superblocks
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:35:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925-work-mount-knullfs-v2-1-c4aebaa186e9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925-work-mount-knullfs-v2-0-c4aebaa186e9@kernel.org>

There's a few instances where a internal superblock is reachable by
fspick(). Block that. graft_tree() and fsmount() already refuse them.
fanotify refuses mount and superblock marks on them for the same reason.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 fs/fsopen.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/fsopen.c b/fs/fsopen.c
index ae19e5136598..9d5a7a22b529 100644
--- a/fs/fsopen.c
+++ b/fs/fsopen.c
@@ -190,6 +190,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(fspick, int, dfd, const char __user *, path, unsigned int, flags
 	ret = -EINVAL;
 	if (target.mnt->mnt_root != target.dentry)
 		goto err_path;
+	/* kernel-internal superblocks are nobody's to reconfigure */
+	if (target.dentry->d_sb->s_flags & SB_NOUSER)
+		goto err_path;
 
 	fc = fs_context_for_reconfigure(target.dentry, 0, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(fc)) {

-- 
2.53.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 22:35 [PATCH RFC v2 0/8] namespace: prevent UMOUNT_CONNECTED reference count cycles Christian Brauner
2026-09-24 22:35 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-09-24 22:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/8] fsnotify: record the superblock a connector is accounted on Christian Brauner
2026-09-24 22:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/8] fs: put the old fs_struct before the old namespaces in unshare() Christian Brauner
2026-09-24 22:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/8] namespace: drop the file's reference first in dissolve_on_fput() Christian Brauner
2026-09-24 22:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/8] namespace: prevent UMOUNT_CONNECTED reference count cycles Christian Brauner
2026-09-24 22:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/8] selftests/filesystems: check that a loop mount below a dead mount is released Christian Brauner
2026-09-24 22:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 7/8] selftests/filesystems: check the two-step cycle over crossed loop images Christian Brauner
2026-09-24 22:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] selftests/filesystems: check that the holders let go of a dead mount Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260925-work-mount-knullfs-v2-1-c4aebaa186e9@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox