From: NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/9] nfs: fix open-blocking with d_fsdata
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 12:21:11 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929022547.1428036-2-neilb@ownmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929022547.1428036-1-neilb@ownmail.net>
From: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
The logic described in block_revalidate() that ->d_lock must be taken in
lookup_open() missed the fact that sometimes lookup_open() isn't called.
If open_last_lookups() is called while still in RCU-walk and
lookup_fast() finds a dentry, it does not take ->d_lock or increment
d_count() before calling d_revalidate() - only afterwards.
So on that path d_count() can be incremented and the file opened *after*
nfs_unlink() has checked d_count() and set NFS_FSDATA_BLOCKED. So an
application could have the file open when it is unlinked on the server.
To fix this we need block_revalidate() to ensure the RCU-walk path
is blocked as well. This is easily done with
write_seqcount_invalidate(&dentry->d_seq);
legitimize_path() will increment d_count() and then check d_seq.
The write_seqcount_invalidate() call with cause that check to fail if
nfs_unlink() has already seen d_count() being 1. So the RCU-walk will
fail with -ECHILD and it will be retried as a ref-walk.
Also the smp_load_acquire() in __nfs_lookup_revalidate() is pointless.
wait_var_event() contains the required barriers (a spinlock in
prepare_to_wait_event()) to ensure the correct value is read after any
wakeup.
That barrier doesn't apply for the very first test of the condition in
wait_var_event) but the locking of ->d_lock described above provides
sufficient barriers.
Fixes: 99bc9f2eb3f7 ("NFS: add barriers when testing for NFS_FSDATA_BLOCKED")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
---
fs/nfs/dir.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
index 49394123bd09..4f1bf45b0c70 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -1837,8 +1837,7 @@ __nfs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
} else {
/* Wait for unlink to complete - see unblock_revalidate() */
wait_var_event(&dentry->d_fsdata,
- smp_load_acquire(&dentry->d_fsdata)
- != NFS_FSDATA_BLOCKED);
+ dentry->d_fsdata != NFS_FSDATA_BLOCKED);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -1857,12 +1856,15 @@ static void block_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry)
kfree(dentry->d_fsdata);
/* Any new reference that could lead to an open
- * will take ->d_lock in lookup_open() -> d_lookup().
- * Holding this lock ensures we cannot race with
- * __nfs_lookup_revalidate() and removes and need
- * for further barriers.
+ * will either:
+ * - take ->d_lock in lookup_open() -> d_lookup() or
+ * - will check d_seq in legitimize_mnt()
+ *
+ * Holding this lock and invalidating ->d_seq ensures we cannot
+ * race with __nfs_lookup_revalidate().
*/
lockdep_assert_held(&dentry->d_lock);
+ write_seqcount_invalidate(&dentry->d_seq);
dentry->d_fsdata = NFS_FSDATA_BLOCKED;
}
base-commit: 3879f51857325da9bf3cfb073280257cd16ae067
--
2.50.0.107.gf914562f5916.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 2:21 [PATCH v2 0/9] nfs: prepare for VFS locking changes NeilBrown
2026-09-29 2:21 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2026-09-29 2:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] nfs: fix nfs_call_unlink() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 2:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] nfs: remove d_drop()/d_alloc_parallel() from nfs_atomic_open() NeilBrown
2026-09-30 14:32 ` John Stoffel
2026-09-30 21:17 ` NeilBrown
2026-10-01 19:43 ` John Stoffel
2026-09-29 2:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] nfs: use d_splice_alias() in nfs_link() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 2:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] nfs: don't d_drop() before d_splice_alias() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 2:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] nfs: don't d_drop() before d_splice_alias() in atomic_create NeilBrown
2026-09-29 2:21 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] nfs: Use d_alloc_trylock() in nfs_prime_dcache() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 2:21 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] nfs: use d_alloc_trylock() in silly-rename NeilBrown
2026-09-29 2:21 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] nfs: use d_duplicate() NeilBrown
2026-09-29 21:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] nfs: prepare for VFS locking changes Anna Schumaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929022547.1428036-2-neilb@ownmail.net \
--to=neilb@ownmail.net \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox