From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21D713DDDA1; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790694077; cv=none; b=h5LQMKZ7yJoqRIWJmMpS6dOQLBW4TAiLiNc/ExP3KclsuPetyhA3WPk4LcRAqATr37g+pHJJMB0AsKDu9AqDjRNlYIilQw3NHqijyJFRyrCj3hwVbWJKpSkt6Eesw+BfNz/nhFVbAU+S8G9+drdV8Y2AnAPajSGc1c062Vj5rnQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790694077; c=relaxed/simple; bh=19zJL66XvCJ/TaYGHp0xcb/QRzdhe4G2rZ5ROWvlZVU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UNPue5u7VaJ6in9kqyUiJOVNlQSHHDZK3QWxzgIqfDOh5ZbLENyA23s2CiTkxISqk0ovHje/5wcBFcYi8lVkNGa8RBxNv32jhDsvtA3a/aekPVxiImbsHzq4YEMgzkG7Z3uPvzsgy0+/U8Qh6+b0YXfIHxx0c0EhX5FOjc0/rb0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gR8PMQaV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gR8PMQaV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id AD2A41F000FF; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:00:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790694056; bh=sP+JRMUCh1L3/Op/O8+puBriEmtt0jW98gKpRGY5Sdg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=gR8PMQaV3MtQSoZ0SVepw5NSSxcOfO0XbaAXVkB4uCf+Gm56J7DY/RHrp8bLpPiqR utlfm38IWHa+VHbuuRHXPU1R0m/ytrRqrv5kVqflU7kdxMw2Lo+4es5a81NCM7gaVm kQknz1MuXCvEhjXAB5c9QG13xpZhkzK51lPGjoN3GVm+aWLIr0bD9OQgaJfMuJ/Ao6 TQdNhTKgvb+jw6qnS5FFGpg4BEIG6uu8B9oX2jt6yp/0Y4L6P1X3N6hSw1IAsFNSDW IdMJivbpqpXFk7CFfFMip6fESUBh7cli15EcTy9q+2nlmNayhhqxH5X1qC/UF97EXL eNx2G8GpxBKYw== Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:00:56 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Steve Shoecraft Cc: Carlos Maiolino , Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] MXFS: a shared-disk clustered filesystem derived from XFS Message-ID: <20260929150056.GG6244@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <56847E8D-EA83-4984-82F3-9BC93E4C02FF@gmail.com> <1B01BE22-06A8-412D-B141-CD94026E0A39@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1B01BE22-06A8-412D-B141-CD94026E0A39@gmail.com> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 09:19:39AM -0400, Steve Shoecraft wrote: > I’m disappointed in your responses. I would have thought that you’d at > least be interested in how well the AI did. And I'm disappointed every time someone unfamiliar to the (xfs) community appears out of nowhere with a giant pile of code (LLM generated or otherwise) and a request that we read it. If you want people to review your code, start by watching the mailing list for a month or two to familiarize yourself with community norms, and to ask questions when others post patches. > It’s going to get better — not worse. > > Since the initial 2-node TCP/DLM release (0.89.77 on September 23), Fable and Astra have completed 2-node CAW (0.90.7 on September 26), and 4-node TCP and CAW (0.90.24) have now been released on: > • Proxmox VE 9 (kernels 6.17 and 7.0) > • RHEL / AlmaLinux / Rocky 9.8 > • Ubuntu 24.04 LTS (GA kernel 6.8) > • Debian 13 (kernel 6.12) > > All are distributed as native DEB/RPM packages, with the kernel module built against the target kernel via DKMS. > > The 0.90.24 release passed the complete release criteria: 4-node TCP 31/31, 4-node CAW 30/30, 2-node TCP 31/31, and 2-node CAW 30/30. All four platforms passed their packaged installation and validation runs. > > The goal is full 32-node support for both TCP and CAW DLM. > > > > The next project is OSN — a fully AI-written OS from scratch. Good luck with that when you can't even be bothered to llmcode a test to make sure the magic numbers do not match standard xfs. --D > > On Sep 27, 2026, at 7:03 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2026 at 07:32:27AM -0500, Steve Shoecraft wrote: > >> > >> Good catch on the magic - I had it changed in previous attempts and forgot on this one - release 0.90.0 has MXFS unique magic. > >> > >> I’ve been writing device drivers since the 90s on FreeBSD. This was a research project to see if an LLM could do it with the right harness. > >> > >> Release conditions of course included 100% data integrity and 100% stability. XFS was the right choice for the base. > >> > >> Intent is a good clustered FS for Proxmox to compete with vSphere and VMFS. Yes, I’m aware of the differences in implementations. > > > > If you are not even bothering reviewing your own project source code as > > you stated, don't expect anybody else to spend their time or have > > interest on it. > > > > > >> > >> > >>> On Sep 26, 2026, at 1:07 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >>> > >>> I don't think too many people are going to care about your LLM dump, > >>> or even review it. But please make sure you use different magic numbers > >>> so that a mxfs image left in the wild is not mistaken for an xfs one. > >