From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.223 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793184078; b=2497OkOx6hBF+TrhlhTYVurO3hKoB53xKFpPuDpKaYXxI/CyUG1mHmZ0U/Avk3QNMpzX vbAcIFPZgzhxx1MuHM+GrW8LZ8qDgQfbm73tyB4b0WWfkIpiHQL3s22yuIOnUML7kNeTV PdXCv0DoBlvbg2X8Yr7wklJuNIi37R3NAiRJzPUG5H7yvR/RZ1lUkqNqhVFTD51b8M8Nl rNtIPbQb8FpSvVPmj2FwOu6eq0DsV7MlftDb3edTOGH0fqigZoEAINg8rBdbaLDFs87IF FbE4VueqliTh/XkHR3ME4F1HkSWoK26270Ij8ykd2qhO18NEpGRU3IftY5OWNAgerKg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793184078; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=7ohDeqYAoftxje+G2/ZUXITZjGtasxeCYee/Ib/dRfM=; b=jzJDfFtlv8XKsnbQwyzPQElAuG0KzkKsGIjjYGx0oSwXjAG7o3eSTPBHHbt4NZGM09aC gsWxcDUWGUzrqHU7T96YE9iA0lEGrthZFywl6u0r9MOymQmxTkhht8QjEvVOP2oVrVCqK akW1yeq2GoYiGxjLd2vviFLHr6LH3OM/xTJPYisNfZzXS7KKBAbfevgIo0fAVPUUabrN9 vApor0gdyE3RFb78K1OywZVgqrWWLeOHZzkkRhkfvKwNw3IJb8SriS0tR8opOAbGtovCi k7Jo7ASOxCHVrUWXMdoa1LzGwsn+KtFY1HmYKpYxG8TIBgB4xZ3wvGrQ6qM2dZZTvIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=uW0yxWCj; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.223 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-223.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.223]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E82606A31A for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2026 10:41:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org B4E82606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=uW0yxWCj X-Envelope-To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=da6hytzw+BnB+C5CyqKjthZJsFrZnHpNjbdkzPMyrmc=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1793184074; v=1; x=1793788874; b=uW0yxWCjiuY/QAk36l36xDIbaSJ/T96tA0HP6WqCEveTeJBUYemWYRj/4Kdrl9erGZEE7or5 sUiXKW8oNGaHZWY2AFZKIRSJoe9vBiTzTCKv4/3aisN/9I/naSVMw40cQwofFWY2LRNiPMMzlhF fBex+2wJ8adqN7qch7lrDyRo= X-Envelope-To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id b2f499d91e478fa4; Wed, 28 Oct 2026 10:41:14 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: b2f499d91e478fa4 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: Lance Yang To: david@kernel.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, qi.zheng@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, ljs@kernel.org, kasong@tencent.com, baohua@kernel.org, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, baoquan.he@linux.dev, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, kees@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, jannh@google.com, pfalcato@suse.de, hughd@google.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pratyush@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz, ziy@nvidia.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, riel@surriel.com, harry@kernel.org, apopple@nvidia.com, nico.pache@linux.dev, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, usama.arif@linux.dev, kas@kernel.org, matthew.brost@intel.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, peterx@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, osalvador@suse.de, minchan@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, xu.xin@linux.dev, chengming.zhou@linux.dev, chrisl@kernel.org, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, nphamcs@gmail.com, youngjun.park@lge.com, gourry@gourry.net, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/46] mm/huge_memory: fix list corruption when deferred_split_scan() races with deferred_split_folio() Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 18:41:07 +0800 Message-ID: <20261028104107.31470-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0 In-Reply-To: <20261027-fixes_core-v1-10-6f74bec9a5bb@kernel.org> References: <20261027-fixes_core-v1-10-6f74bec9a5bb@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 12:17:30AM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: >Since the deferred split queue became a list_lru, the isolate callback >moves the folios it took a reference on to an on-stack list, linked >through folio->_deferred_list, and deferred_split_scan() takes them off >that list with list_del_init() without holding the list_lru lock. > >deferred_split_folio() does not know about the on-stack list. It only >holds the list_lru lock when it looks at the same list_head, and it can >run for such a folio: a THP is queued when it is mapped, as a candidate >for the underused check, and is queued "again" when a part of it gets >unmapped: > > CPU0 deferred_split_scan() CPU1 deferred_split_folio() > list_del_init(&folio->_deferred_list) > next->prev = prev > prev->next = next > entry->next = entry > list_lru_lock_irqsave() > folio_set_partially_mapped() > __list_lru_add() > list_empty(item) -> true > list_add_tail(item, &l->list) > item->next = &l->list > item->prev = tail > entry->prev = entry > >The folio now sits on the list_lru with ->prev pointing to itself. The >next removal leaves the neighbours pointing to it, and they still do so >after the folio has been freed. With CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST: > > list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffd4000000270090, but was > ffd4000000278090. (prev=ffd4000000270090) > >Fix it by grabbing the lock around list_del_init() so >deferred_split_folio() cannot race with it. > >Fixes: fafaeceb89a5 ("mm: switch deferred split shrinker to list_lru") >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >Reported-by: Josef Bacik >Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) >--- Nice work! Reviewed-by: Lance Yang