From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v12 0/7] mm, iomap, NFSD: stop DONTCACHE writes reading back shared pages
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 14:09:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261112190911.84702-1-snitzer@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi,
An RWF_DONTCACHE write is buffered IO: its data goes through the page
cache, and writeback drops each folio once the folio is written back.
A write that starts or ends inside a folio covers that folio only
partially. Usually another write covers the rest of the folio. If
writeback drops the folio before the other write writes its part, the
other write must first read the folio back from disk. 32 threads
writing interleaved records to one XFS file, 4 KiB pages, before and
after 5/7:
record pwritev2() flags 4 KiB device MiB/s
bytes reads per write
before after before after
47008 RWF_DONTCACHE 0.97 0.0005 831 2281
47008 RWF_DONTCACHE|RWF_DSYNC 0.99 0.0005 601 1227
6000 RWF_DONTCACHE 0.97 0.0001 121 488
6000 RWF_DONTCACHE|RWF_DSYNC 0.99 0.0002 90 206
47008 bytes is the transfer size of IO500's ior-hard, in which each
rank writes interleaved records to one shared file. Any record size
that is not a multiple of the page size has the same problem. 6000
bytes is a second example.
The test program and script: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/atqJBS8MlYfeUU-t@kernel.org/
- 1/7 moves code into a helper, with no functional change.
- 2/7 fixes 88d6f128d06d ("mm: track DONTCACHE dirty pages per
bdi_writeback"), in v7.3: WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY could drift.
- 3/7 reports WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY in the bdi debugfs stats.
- 4/7 adds folio_mark_dropbehind() for a folio that is already dirty.
- 5/7 keeps a partially covered folio until the write that completes it.
- 6/7 lets a writer that syncs its own write complete those folios
itself, after the sync.
- 7/7 makes NFSD do that for the misaligned ends of a direct-mode WRITE.
Merging: Chuck suggested taking the series through the mm tree. 1/7 to
6/7 apply cleanly to each of these mm branches:
mm-unstable 4318887a3efa ("fs/proc/task_mmu: fix lost maps entries above 2^63")
mm-new daed51c91051 ("riscv: mm: fix concurrency in mark_new_valid_map()")
mm-stable fa4ad798f6f6 ("Merge tag 'for-7.4-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux")
7/7 needs the NFSD direct-mode changes that are in cel/nfsd-testing.
The whole series applies to cel/nfsd-testing at ab036e3a0dd4 ("NFSD:
Refuse a direct READ whose aligned range exceeds the reply pages"),
where each patch builds with W=1 with no warnings. So 7/7 could follow
in the nfsd tree once the mm part is merged.
Changes since v11:
- 4/7: folio_mark_dropbehind() leaves a mapped folio unmarked. Through
its page table, a mapped folio can be dirtied without the folio lock,
and PG_dirty set before the folio is counted. With a stale dirty tag,
folio_mark_dropbehind() then counted the folio in WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY,
and the dirtier counted it again. sashiko found this in its review of
v11 4/7 (https://lore.kernel.org/r/sashiko-outbox-210121@kernel.org).
The folio lock keeps an unmapped folio unmapped, so the window is
closed for every dirtier that does not use buffer heads.
filemap_end_dropbehind() does not drop a mapped folio either.
- 6/7: filemap_dontcache_edge_complete() leaves a mapped folio alone,
dirty or clean, to match.
- Jeff's Reviewed-by is dropped from 4/7, which now has a code change.
- Testing: a KUnit test (not in this series) runs the interleaving from
sashiko's review step by step. On an unmapped folio, the folio is
counted twice. On a mapped folio, v12 leaves it unmarked and the
count is correct. The v11 tests through NFSD and with RWF_DONTCACHE
give the same results with v12.
- Rebased on the current cel/nfsd-testing.
v11: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20261111015607.46338-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
v10: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20261103211754.35352-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
v9: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20261024221152.6965-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
v8: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20261023024548.71123-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
v7: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20261020220346.28020-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
v6: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/atbfEbgMU6UGkn2X@kernel.org/
v5: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20261019150725.1507-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20261015233309.42999-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20261001045502.48381-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20260929231329.22018-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20260929173423.16149-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Snitzer (7):
mm: move clearing the dropbehind flag of a found folio into a helper
mm: take a folio off WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY only if it was counted there
mm: expose WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY in bdi debugfs stats
mm: add folio_mark_dropbehind() to mark a folio dropbehind and account it
mm, iomap: keep a partially covered page until a DONTCACHE write completes it
mm, iomap: let a DONTCACHE writer complete its shared pages itself
NFSD: drop a shared boundary page only once both WRITEs have written it
.../filesystems/nfs/nfsd-io-modes.rst | 18 ++
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 30 ++-
fs/iomap/trace.h | 3 +-
fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 107 ++++++++-
include/linux/fs.h | 5 +-
include/linux/iomap.h | 1 +
include/linux/pagemap.h | 12 +
mm/backing-dev.c | 6 +
mm/filemap.c | 219 ++++++++++++++++--
9 files changed, 370 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
base-commit: ab036e3a0dd410f762192f33d6244e7993b36f8d
--
2.52.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 19:09 Mike Snitzer [this message]
2026-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH v12 1/7] mm: move clearing the dropbehind flag of a found folio into a helper Mike Snitzer
2026-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH v12 2/7] mm: take a folio off WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY only if it was counted there Mike Snitzer
2026-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH v12 3/7] mm: expose WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY in bdi debugfs stats Mike Snitzer
2026-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH v12 4/7] mm: add folio_mark_dropbehind() to mark a folio dropbehind and account it Mike Snitzer
2026-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH v12 5/7] mm, iomap: keep a partially covered page until a DONTCACHE write completes it Mike Snitzer
2026-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH v12 6/7] mm, iomap: let a DONTCACHE writer complete its shared pages itself Mike Snitzer
2026-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH v12 7/7] NFSD: drop a shared boundary page only once both WRITEs have written it Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261112190911.84702-1-snitzer@kernel.org \
--to=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).