From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Automatic NFSv4 state revocation on filesystem unmount
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 11:25:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <206cb47d470bb06b26175755adec013cfac759d7.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260108004016.3907158-1-cel@kernel.org>
On Wed, 2026-01-07 at 19:40 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>
> When an NFS server exports a filesystem and clients hold NFSv4 state
> (opens, locks, delegations), unmounting the underlying filesystem
> fails with EBUSY. The /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_fs interface exists for
> administrators to manually revoke state before retrying the unmount,
> but this approach has significant operational drawbacks.
>
> Manual intervention breaks automation workflows. Containerized NFS
> servers, orchestration systems, and unattended maintenance scripts
> cannot reliably unmount exported filesystems without implementing
> custom logic to detect the failure and invoke unlock_fs. System
> administrators managing many exports face tedious, error-prone
> procedures when decommissioning storage.
>
> This series enables the NFS server to detect filesystem unmount
> events and automatically revoke associated state. The mechanism
> uses the kernel's existing fs_pin infrastructure, which provides
> callbacks during mount lifecycle transitions.
>
(cc'ing the vfs maintainers)
One thing I want to point out here is that the only user of fs_pin is
the BSD process accounting subsystem, which would be really nice to get
rid of at some point:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20260106-bsd-acct-v1-1-d15564b52c83@kernel.org/
I suspect the VFS maintainers might want you to use something different
here so fs_pin can eventually go away too.
An alternate idea might be to plumb an srcu notifier chain into the
umount codepath, similar to the lease_notifier_chain in fs/locks.c.
Then nfsd could register to be notified when there is a umount attempt
and do the right thing to tear down state.
> When a filesystem
> is unmounted, all NFSv4 opens, locks, and delegations referencing
> it are revoked, async COPY operations are cancelled with
> NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED sent to clients, NLM locks are released,
> and cached file handles are closed.
>
> With automatic revocation, unmount operations complete without
> administrator intervention once the brief state cleanup finishes.
> Clients receive immediate notification of state loss through
> standard NFSv4 error codes, allowing applications to handle the
> situation appropriately rather than encountering silent failures.
>
> Based on the nfsd-testing branch of:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux.git/
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Explain why drop_client() is being renamed
> - Finish implementing revocation on umount
> - Rename pin_insert_group
> - Clarified log output and code comments
> - Hold nfsd_mutex while closing nfsd_files
>
> Chuck Lever (6):
> nfsd: cancel async COPY operations when admin revokes filesystem state
> fs: export pin_insert and pin_remove for modular filesystems
> fs: add pin_insert_sb() for superblock-only pins
> fs: invoke group_pin_kill() during mount teardown
> nfsd: revoke NFSv4 state when filesystem is unmounted
> nfsd: close cached files on filesystem unmount
>
> fs/fs_pin.c | 50 ++++++++
> fs/namespace.c | 2 +
> fs/nfsd/Makefile | 2 +-
> fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 44 +++++++
> fs/nfsd/filecache.h | 1 +
> fs/nfsd/netns.h | 4 +
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++--
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 46 +++++--
> fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 11 +-
> fs/nfsd/pin.c | 274 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/nfsd/state.h | 9 ++
> fs/nfsd/xdr4.h | 1 +
> include/linux/fs_pin.h | 1 +
> 13 files changed, 548 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 fs/nfsd/pin.c
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-09 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-08 0:40 [PATCH v2 0/6] Automatic NFSv4 state revocation on filesystem unmount Chuck Lever
2026-01-08 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] nfsd: cancel async COPY operations when admin revokes filesystem state Chuck Lever
2026-01-08 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] fs: export pin_insert and pin_remove for modular filesystems Chuck Lever
2026-01-08 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] fs: add pin_insert_sb() for superblock-only pins Chuck Lever
2026-01-08 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] fs: invoke group_pin_kill() during mount teardown Chuck Lever
2026-01-09 8:38 ` NeilBrown
2026-01-09 16:04 ` Chuck Lever
2026-01-10 16:49 ` Al Viro
2026-01-10 20:07 ` Chuck Lever
2026-01-10 21:52 ` NeilBrown
2026-01-10 22:08 ` Al Viro
2026-01-10 22:31 ` Chuck Lever
2026-01-08 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] nfsd: revoke NFSv4 state when filesystem is unmounted Chuck Lever
2026-01-09 9:06 ` NeilBrown
2026-01-08 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] nfsd: close cached files on filesystem unmount Chuck Lever
2026-01-09 16:25 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-01-12 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Automatic NFSv4 state revocation " Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=206cb47d470bb06b26175755adec013cfac759d7.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@ownmail.net \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox