From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's
	security ID to be obtained [try #2]
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:06:55 +0100
Message-ID: <20932.1186682815@redhat.com>
References: <162335.27499.qm@web36605.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Linux filesystem caching discussion list <linux-cachefs@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org,
	trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, torvalds@osdl.org,
	linux-cachefs@redhat.com, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: casey@schaufler-ca.com
Return-path: <linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <162335.27499.qm@web36605.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs>,
	<mailto:linux-cachefs-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cachefs>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-cachefs@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-cachefs-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs>,
	<mailto:linux-cachefs-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:

> This is SELinux specific functionality. It should not be an LSM
> interface. 

This is what I worked out in conjunction with the denizens of the SELinux
mailing list.  What would you have me do differently?  Change things like:

	u32 (*act_as_secid)(u32 secid);

to something like:

	void (*act_as_secid)(const char *newsecdata, u32 newseclen,
			     char *oldsecdata, u32 *oldseclen);

David