From: Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fsx: support reads/writes from buffers backed by hugepages
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 10:39:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20ededbc-d915-4850-80f7-61585fdfd156@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJnrk1ad0KPYkLmW3sXimrJ52LL_quoxAYX6WUZ9jKnMTUa8-A@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/24/24 02:37, Joanne Koong wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 11:47 PM Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2024-12-18 at 13:01 -0800, Joanne Koong wrote:
>>> Add support for reads/writes from buffers backed by hugepages.
>>> This can be enabled through the '-h' flag. This flag should only be
>>> used
>>> on systems where THP capabilities are enabled.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> ltp/fsx.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> --
>>> 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/ltp/fsx.c b/ltp/fsx.c
>>> index 41933354..3656fd9f 100644
>>> --- a/ltp/fsx.c
>>> +++ b/ltp/fsx.c
>>> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ int o_direct; /* -Z */
>>> +static long
>>> +get_hugepage_size(void)
>>> +{
>>> + const char *str = "Hugepagesize:";
>>> + long hugepage_size = -1;
>>> + char buffer[64];
>>> + FILE *file;
>>> +
>>> + file = fopen("/proc/meminfo", "r");
>>> + if (!file) {
>>> + prterr("get_hugepage_size: fopen /proc/meminfo");
>>> + return -1;
>>> + }
>>> + while (fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), file)) {
>>> + if (strncmp(buffer, str, strlen(str)) == 0) {
>> Extremely minor: Since str is a fixed string, why not calculate the
>> length outside the loop and not re-use strlen(str) multiple times?
> Thinking about this some more, maybe it'd be best to define it as
> const char str[] = "Hugepagesize:" as an array of chars and use sizeof
> which would be at compile-time instead of runtime.
> I'll do this for v2.
Yes, that is a good idea too. Thanks.
>
>>> + sscanf(buffer + strlen(str), "%ld",
>>> &hugepage_size);
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + fclose(file);
>>> + if (hugepage_size == -1) {
>>> + prterr("get_hugepage_size: failed to find "
>>> + "hugepage size in /proc/meminfo\n");
>>> + return -1;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* convert from KiB to bytes */
>>> + return hugepage_size * 1024;
>> Minor: << 10 might be faster instead of '*' ?
> Will do for v2.
Thanks.
>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void *
>>> +init_hugepages_buf(unsigned len, long hugepage_size)
>>> +{
>>> + void *buf;
>>> + long buf_size = roundup(len, hugepage_size);
>>> +
>>> + if (posix_memalign(&buf, hugepage_size, buf_size)) {
>>> + prterr("posix_memalign for buf");
>>> + return NULL;
>>> + }
>>> + memset(buf, '\0', len);
>>> + if (madvise(buf, buf_size, MADV_COLLAPSE)) {
>>> + prterr("madvise collapse for buf");
>>> + free(buf);
>>> + return NULL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return buf;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static struct option longopts[] = {
>>> {"replay-ops", required_argument, 0, 256},
>>> {"record-ops", optional_argument, 0, 255},
>>> @@ -2883,7 +2935,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
>>> setvbuf(stdout, (char *)0, _IOLBF, 0); /* line buffered stdout
>>> */
>>>
>>> while ((ch = getopt_long(argc, argv,
>>> - "0b:c:de:fg:i:j:kl:m:no:p:qr:s:t:uw:xy
>>> ABD:EFJKHzCILN:OP:RS:UWXZ",
>>> + "0b:c:de:fg:hi:j:kl:m:no:p:qr:s:t:uw:x
>>> yABD:EFJKHzCILN:OP:RS:UWXZ",
>>> longopts, NULL)) != EOF)
>>> switch (ch) {
>>> case 'b':
>>> @@ -2916,6 +2968,9 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
>>> case 'g':
>>> filldata = *optarg;
>>> break;
>>> + case 'h':
>>> + hugepages = 1;
>>> + break;
>>> case 'i':
>>> integrity = 1;
>>> logdev = strdup(optarg);
>>> @@ -3232,12 +3287,41 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
>>> original_buf = (char *) malloc(maxfilelen);
>>> for (i = 0; i < maxfilelen; i++)
>>> original_buf[i] = random() % 256;
>>> - good_buf = (char *) malloc(maxfilelen + writebdy);
>>> - good_buf = round_ptr_up(good_buf, writebdy, 0);
>>> - memset(good_buf, '\0', maxfilelen);
>>> - temp_buf = (char *) malloc(maxoplen + readbdy);
>>> - temp_buf = round_ptr_up(temp_buf, readbdy, 0);
>>> - memset(temp_buf, '\0', maxoplen);
>>> + if (hugepages) {
>>> + long hugepage_size;
>>> +
>>> + hugepage_size = get_hugepage_size();
>>> + if (hugepage_size == -1) {
>>> + prterr("get_hugepage_size()");
>>> + exit(99);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (writebdy != 1 && writebdy != hugepage_size)
>>> + prt("ignoring write alignment (since -h is
>>> enabled)");
>>> +
>>> + if (readbdy != 1 && readbdy != hugepage_size)
>>> + prt("ignoring read alignment (since -h is
>>> enabled)");
>>> +
>>> + good_buf = init_hugepages_buf(maxfilelen,
>>> hugepage_size);
>>> + if (!good_buf) {
>>> + prterr("init_hugepages_buf failed for
>>> good_buf");
>>> + exit(100);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + temp_buf = init_hugepages_buf(maxoplen, hugepage_size);
>>> + if (!temp_buf) {
>>> + prterr("init_hugepages_buf failed for
>>> temp_buf");
>>> + exit(101);
>>> + }
>>> + } else {
>>> + good_buf = (char *) malloc(maxfilelen + writebdy);
>>> + good_buf = round_ptr_up(good_buf, writebdy, 0);
>> Not sure if it would matter but aren't we seeing a small memory leak
>> here since good_buf's original will be lost after rounding up?
> This is inherited from the original code but AFAICT, it relies on the
> memory being cleaned up at exit time (eg free() is never called on
> good_buf and temp_buf either).
Okay, makes sense.
--
NR
>
>
> Thanks,
> Joanne
>
>>> + memset(good_buf, '\0', maxfilelen);
>>> +
>>> + temp_buf = (char *) malloc(maxoplen + readbdy);
>>> + temp_buf = round_ptr_up(temp_buf, readbdy, 0);
>>> + memset(temp_buf, '\0', maxoplen);
>>> + }
>>> if (lite) { /* zero entire existing file */
>>> ssize_t written;
>>>
--
---
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-24 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 21:01 [PATCH 0/2] fstests: test reads/writes from hugepages-backed buffers Joanne Koong
2024-12-18 21:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] fsx: support reads/writes from buffers backed by hugepages Joanne Koong
2024-12-19 14:29 ` Brian Foster
2024-12-19 22:34 ` Joanne Koong
2024-12-20 11:52 ` Brian Foster
2024-12-23 20:59 ` Joanne Koong
2024-12-27 19:22 ` Joanne Koong
2024-12-19 17:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-19 22:51 ` Joanne Koong
2024-12-20 7:47 ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-12-23 21:07 ` Joanne Koong
2024-12-24 5:09 ` Nirjhar Roy [this message]
2024-12-18 21:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] generic: add tests for read/writes from hugepages-backed buffers Joanne Koong
2024-12-19 17:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-19 21:36 ` Joanne Koong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20ededbc-d915-4850-80f7-61585fdfd156@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nirjhar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox