From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46610 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751678AbdGEPdg (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:33:36 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20170705113023.4dbbc3a6@gandalf.local.home> References: <20170705113023.4dbbc3a6@gandalf.local.home> <149926824154.20611.6104595541055328700.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <149926824918.20611.721200514474820755.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Steven Rostedt Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Greg Kroah-Hartman , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] VFS: Don't use save/replace_mount_options if not using generic_show_options MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <21062.1499268809.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 16:33:29 +0100 Message-ID: <21063.1499268809@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Steven Rostedt wrote: > As this is patch 1/14, is there any dependency on this working? That > is, it is safe to simply remove this caller from those locations? Or > are there dependencies on having any of the 2-14 patches added to make > it not cause issues? Patch 14 removes the then-unused helpers, but patches 1-13 otherwise are independent of each other and have no dependencies on earlier patches. David