From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
To: Jeremi Piotrowski <jeremi.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Regression in squashfs mount option handling in v5.4
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:10:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2286b071-76ac-1659-5dba-6381ecb269c6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210185002.GA20850@gentoo-tp.home>
On 12/10/19 1:50 PM, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 10:56:47AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> [adding Cc-s]
>>
>> On 11/30/19 10:15 AM, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm working on an embedded project which uses 'rauc' as an updater. rauc mounts
>>> a squashfs image using
>>>
>>> mount -t squashfs -o ro,loop,sizelimit=xxx squashfs.img /mnt
>>>
>>> On my system mount is busybox, and busybox does not know the sizelimit
>>> parameter, so it simply passes it on to the mount syscall. The syscall
>>> arguments end up being:
>>>
>>> mount("/dev/loop0", "dir", "squashfs", MS_RDONLY|MS_SILENT, "sizelimit=xxx")
>>>
>>> Until kernel 5.4 this worked, since 5.4 this returns EINVAL and dmesg contains
>>> the line "squashfs: Unknown parameter 'sizelimit'". I believe this has to do
>>> with the conversion of squashfs to the new mount api.
>>>
>>> This is an unfortunate regression, and it does not seem like this can be simply
>>> reverted. What is the suggested course of action?
>>>
>>> Please cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the list.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jeremi
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ~Randy
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
>
> Ping. This is preventing me from updating the kernel on my systems.
>
Fedora is hitting a similar issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781863
Dec 10 10:04:06 kernel: squashfs: version 4.0 (2009/01/31) Phillip Lougher
Dec 10 10:04:06 kernel: squashfs: Unknown parameter 'errors'
I don't think squashfs ever actually supported the errors parameter
but it was just silently ignored. It turns out you could can pass
whatever nonsense you want for parameters so I don't think we can
reject parameters in the generic case
diff --git a/fs/fs_context.c b/fs/fs_context.c
index 138b5b4d621d..7ec20b1f8a53 100644
--- a/fs/fs_context.c
+++ b/fs/fs_context.c
@@ -160,8 +160,7 @@ int vfs_parse_fs_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
return 0;
}
- return invalf(fc, "%s: Unknown parameter '%s'",
- fc->fs_type->name, param->key);
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_parse_fs_param);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191130181548.GA28459@gentoo-tp.home>
2019-11-30 18:56 ` Regression in squashfs mount option handling in v5.4 Randy Dunlap
2019-12-10 18:50 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2019-12-10 22:10 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2286b071-76ac-1659-5dba-6381ecb269c6@redhat.com \
--to=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremi.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip@squashfs.org.uk \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).