From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:04:17 -0700 Message-ID: <23320000.1093550657@flay> References: <20040824202521.GA26705@lst.de> <412CEE38.1080707@namesys.com> <20040825152805.45a1ce64.akpm@osdl.org> <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, torvalds@osdl.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: Hans Reiser , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org > Don't move reiser4 into vfs, use reiser4 as the vfs. Ah ... that seems to be a good insight into what you're driving for. That would seem to be good for you ... and bad for other filesystems. So whilst I can see why you'd want it - but I don't think it's a good idea. Competition is good. Andrew wrote: > And what are the licensing implications of plugins? Are they derived > works? Must they be GPL'ed? You replied: >>And what are the licensing implications of plugins? Are they derived >>works? > > Yes. I find it odd that you cut out the last part of his question. So must they be GPL'ed or not? M.