From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([195.201.40.130]:51558 "EHLO
        lithops.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1727906AbfAHPjI (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:39:08 -0500
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Pali =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
        Andreas Bombe <andreas.bombe@gmail.com>,
        Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>,
        Jaroslav Skarvada <jskarvad@redhat.com>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        util-linux@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        mpluskal@suse.com, base-system@gentoo.org,
        Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>, Andreas Bombe <aeb@debian.org>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Subject: Re: Future of dosfstools project (FAT)
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 16:39:04 +0100
Message-ID: <2431182.t5fd7Oadsi@blindfold>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VfJpy572t8swsEsz0kPKfpOE-v0SZVxM2aakX0hkjX4=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180929084038.an6pfhnsd6tblejl@pali> <20181227221748.zsz6bwqqia7ybfwj@pali> <CAHp75VfJpy572t8swsEsz0kPKfpOE-v0SZVxM2aakX0hkjX4=Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Am Dienstag, 8. Januar 2019, 16:32:55 CET schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:18 AM Pali Roh�r <pali.rohar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Monday 17 December 2018 10:50:04 Pali Roh�r wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 12 December 2018 14:57:36 Pali Roh�r wrote:
> 
> > > Thanks for review of #94! As next you can take #92 from list.
> >
> > Andreas, can you look at next pull requests?
> 
> Looking from a side how slow this is being processed I think the best
> option to fork and abandon the old project if author / maintainer by
> some reason wouldn't like to give a push rights.

+1

Thanks,
//richard