From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/30] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #11] Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:12:31 +0100 Message-ID: <24563.1154171551@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> References: <20060728230540.7358b435.akpm@osdl.org> <20060727205222.8443.29381.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Reply-To: Linux filesystem caching discussion list Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060728230540.7358b435.akpm@osdl.org> To: Andrew Morton List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > > These patches make it possible to share NFS superblocks between related > > mounts, where "related" means on the same server and FSID. Inodes and > > dentries will be shared where the NFS filehandles are the same (for > > example if two NFS3 files come from the same export but from different > > mounts, such as is not uncommon with autofs on /home). > > It's not clear why these were sent. To try and elicit some feedback. > The first 25 patches are, as far as I can tell, already in Trond's tree. > Whether Trond has the correct versions of these is now anybody's guess... He hasn't told me of any changes, but that doesn't mean he hasn't made any, I suppose. > "[PATCH 26/30] NFS: Use local caching" appears to be the first patch which > isn't in Trond's tree, but it doesn't work due to significant changes in > nfs_clear_inode(). Hmmm... David