From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2] Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:22:14 +0100 Message-ID: <2670.1186737734@redhat.com> References: <503721.44439.qm@web36615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Reply-To: Linux filesystem caching discussion list Cc: akpm@osdl.org, LSM List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, James Morris , trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: casey@schaufler-ca.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <503721.44439.qm@web36615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Casey Schaufler wrote: > Grumble. Yet another thing to undo in the near future. I still > hope to suggest what I would consider a viable alternative "soon". Use a struct key with the overrides attached? The key can be generated by SELinux or whatever module is there. David