linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Perepechko <anserper@yandex.ru>
To: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuichi Ihara <sihara@ddn.com>, Wang Shilong <wshilong@ddn.com>,
	Li Xi <lixi@ddn.com>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: quota: dqio_mutex design
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 16:41:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2768942.M4bvsTtnaB@panda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9B-QnvPJTvh3b0igBOJm+i-kzWPLcKM0qiPb-sfLxztzJUaA@mail.gmail.com>

> 
> This change mean if this dquot is dirty we skip, this
> won't work because in this way, quota update is only kept in vfs dquota
> memory and newer update is not wrote to journal file and not wrapped into
> transaction too.

That's not true.

As I explained earlier, having DQ_MOD_B set at this point means another
thread is going to write dquot but hasn't yet started doing so. This thread
does not care whether it updates the ondisk dquot with its own data or with
fresher data which came from another thread. In-core dquot has no indication
of whose data in contains.

As I also explained earlier, the update cannot happen in the context of
another transaction because thread A which sees DQ_MOD_B set and thread
B which is running dquot_commit() both have journal handles to the same
transaction. There's only one running transaction at a time and thread B does
not switch to another transaction.

Please read the code carefully.


> 
> This is not what journal quota means to do.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Shilong
> 
> > Thank you,
> > Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-03 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-02 12:23 quota: dqio_mutex design Andrew Perepechko
2017-03-03 10:08 ` Jan Kara
2017-03-09 22:29   ` Andrew Perepechko
2017-03-13  8:44     ` Jan Kara
2017-06-21 10:52   ` Jan Kara
     [not found]     ` <4181747.CBilgxvOab@panda>
2017-08-01 13:02       ` Jan Kara
2017-08-02 16:25         ` Jan Kara
2017-08-02 17:52           ` Andrew Perepechko
2017-08-03 11:09             ` Jan Kara
2017-08-03 11:31             ` Wang Shilong
2017-08-03 12:24               ` Andrew Perepechko
2017-08-03 13:19                 ` Wang Shilong
2017-08-03 13:41                   ` Andrew Perepechko [this message]
2017-08-03 13:55                     ` Andrew Perepechko
2017-08-03 14:23                       ` Jan Kara
2017-08-03 14:36               ` Jan Kara
2017-08-03 14:39                 ` Wang Shilong
2017-08-08 16:06                   ` Jan Kara
2017-08-14  3:24                     ` Wang Shilong
2017-08-14  3:28                       ` Wang Shilong
2017-08-14  3:53                       ` Wang Shilong
2017-08-14  8:22                         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2768942.M4bvsTtnaB@panda \
    --to=anserper@yandex.ru \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lixi@ddn.com \
    --cc=sihara@ddn.com \
    --cc=wangshilong1991@gmail.com \
    --cc=wshilong@ddn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).