From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: The VFS hot tracking debacle Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:34:49 +0200 Message-ID: <2831755.nuyKSN0E6B@merkaba> References: <1383745544-391-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Poelzleithner Return-path: Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:46295 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754004AbaGQVlU (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2014 17:41:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2014, 19:35:53 schrieb Daniel Poelzleithner: > Zhi Yong Wu gmail.com> writes: > > Ping ^ 7 > > I'm following this patch now for quite some time and I have to say that this > thread+patch is one of the most disappointing experiences I had with kernel > development. > > I can't understand why such a patch is simply ignored from the maintainers > of the subsystem, no comment, no review, no checkin. I always wanted to try this one out, but never got around doing it. I really like the general approach of it to put the general stuff into VFS and only the special stuff into filesystems like BTRFS. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7