From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH] CRED: Fix NFSD regression Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:56:11 +0000 Message-ID: <28704.1231271771@redhat.com> References: <20090106194101.GB5901@fieldses.org> <806.1231174132@redhat.com> <20090105171937.4463.98583.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, jmorris@namei.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:57469 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751492AbZAFT4V (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:56:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090106194101.GB5901@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: J. Bruce Fields wrote: > OK, I've tested this and applied it for 2.6.29. > > Though it only actually fixes the regression if your other patch ("CRED: > Fix regression in cap_capable() as shown up by sys_faccessat() [ver #2") > is also applied. I'd like to send in my pull request today, but I > usually try not to send a pull request whose tip doesn't pass at least > my basic regression tests.... And that other patch is outside my > baliwick. Can someone else handle it? Well, if you're willing to supply an Acked-by or Tested-by for one or both patches I can pass them on to James or Linus. David