From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8826C4332F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 15:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229801AbiL0P2A (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:28:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40118 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229762AbiL0P16 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:27:58 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10305BE7 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 07:27:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id j8-20020a17090a3e0800b00225fdd5007fso3880239pjc.2 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 07:27:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:content-id:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:cc :to:subject:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ASoHy6OScQmpw4bK1n2Ii+31l8avJ1MNn3Rm11G5sRY=; b=JTRvHazi+STDMGNST2mSlQjIDFhRu2fKLHLEjViu1OvNU4E5xDepZtOvPZ+ajLutqD Jx/ucxMeX5WjrAWQgpIDll9OP10jYmfg4UwZnvYuOrOjkOM/5GqnTf3mADk/0c9aQ2rs 6LozNbAX0jOt89N77g+cF9GkriC4trjdx6vxJzBOKuUiMPBuzWO6aD+xKDJzjqSxYh+w IelKydq0LY44rezN97tV1E7O9UdkTmOc4qGMLsUV+dKwG/Y2Tk8/+v5626qGmZsgE8ya PuhD9QIauJAFsyQqBKO/5TPt8OIDaSpOxz3euWzlApEEBqRBY9LwtVMshv24505up8WK UorA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:content-id:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:cc :to:subject:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ASoHy6OScQmpw4bK1n2Ii+31l8avJ1MNn3Rm11G5sRY=; b=gBPd87DV1+k77NrQacWONY+2bA51v5Ppxj9abODiKqzbb3s5XbYQ70UpfRb8bkv5Lh FbPOg/ONbfLNwTLZenfI/swBLwH6T1cfm8q0Wn6jjGlbHf89NnX5c6afiTYy2FKFFG6g hgES8dfOpawI257Y1UZDiKXJVloewxpH8gpjoM7C7v0MBYhBr3Siu0szPul2ttEPkmFM jNbzc50EDamG7rRoNyx7TYom3eHpYbTlUvq/FvQSx9+vldBGuHRIEZ1YNU6M55IOvq4S reVq1+tUUCxoWljl5gOfMhmaxvrvcvrrLJ9vm5nNhjUfFUaPA0Jwn8+PavatXo3DAwFY lXIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krF5pLwMweaNH/vjgTA2tJuoAon6I/kLj0Q/tz6P3azcYxGUGrq k3Myes3oXtMiyMYmytB2Fso= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXulwQ2O7iPj+eECV9ptpfsp8UWYezRHBjg8YbTb70OOeBqjZPdn/VD+o73yiviQ00kfhbq2AQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:768c:b0:189:e360:ce5 with SMTP id m12-20020a170902768c00b00189e3600ce5mr37294180pll.12.1672154877525; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 07:27:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from jromail.nowhere (h219-110-108-104.catv02.itscom.jp. [219.110.108.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k11-20020a170902c40b00b001926a76e8absm6329562plk.114.2022.12.27.07.27.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Dec 2022 07:27:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=jrobl) by jrobl id 1pABrv-0007aM-4Y ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 00:27:55 +0900 From: "J. R. Okajima" Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] acl updates for v6.2 To: Christian Brauner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20221212111919.98855-1-brauner@kernel.org> References: <20221212111919.98855-1-brauner@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <29160.1672154875.1@jrobl> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 00:27:55 +0900 Message-ID: <29161.1672154875@jrobl> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Christian Brauner: > This series passes the LTP and xfstests suites without any regressions. For > xfstests the following combinations were tested: I've found a behaviour got changed from v6.1 to v6.2-rc1 on ext3 (ext4). ---------------------------------------- on v6.1 + ls -ld /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir drwxrwsr-x 2 nobody nogroup 1024 Dec 27 14:46 /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir + getfacl -d /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir # file: dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir # owner: nobody # group: nogroup # flags: -s- ---------------------------------------- on v6.2-rc1 + ls -ld /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir drwxrwsr-x+ 2 nobody nogroup 1024 Dec 27 23:51 /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir + getfacl -d /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir # file: dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir # owner: nobody # group: nogroup # flags: -s- user::rwx user:root:rwx group::r-x mask::rwx other::r-x ---------------------------------------- - in the output from 'ls -l', the extra '+' appears - in the output from 'getfacl -d', some lines are appended - in those lines, I am not sure whether 'user:root:rwx' is correct or not. Even it is correct, getfacl on v6.1 didn't produce such lines. Is this change intentional? In other words, is this patch series for a bugfix? J. R. Okajima