From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] [RFC] AFS: Implement OpenAFS pioctls(version)s Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:30:23 +0100 Message-ID: <29187.1245267023@redhat.com> References: <20090617001157.065ee652@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090616203845.4526.60013.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <10437.1245193192@redhat.com> <11650.1245198358@redhat.com> <20090617075502.GB13073@webber.adilger.int> <28023.1245259479@redhat.com> <28259.1245261823@redhat.com> <20090617183036.GA7867@mit.edu> Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Theodore Tso , Linus Torvalds , Andreas Dilger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, Alan Cox To: david@lang.hm Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:52930 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754307AbZFQTak (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:30:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: david@lang.hm wrote: > so does this mean that there can never be more than a single AFS filesystem > mounted? Currently, in a way, yes: the existence of pathless pioctls ensures that. kAFS does use multiple mounts, one per volume, but they're normally rooted at /afs. David