From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. R. Okajima" Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/58] merge ext2 delete_inode and clear_inode, switch to ->evict_inode() Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:17:07 +0900 Message-ID: <29792.1276093027@jrobl> References: Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Return-path: Received: from mtoichi13.ns.itscom.net ([219.110.2.183]:45789 "EHLO mtoichi13.ns.itscom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754856Ab0FIORU (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:17:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Al Viro: > diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c > index 069620b..7e4a455 100644 > --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c > @@ -69,26 +69,42 @@ static void ext2_write_failed(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t to) > /* > * Called at the last iput() if i_nlink is zero. > */ > -void ext2_delete_inode (struct inode * inode) > +void ext2_evict_inode(struct inode * inode) Just a comment, * Called at the last iput() regardless i_nlink count. right? J. R. Okajima