From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Coywolf Qi Hunt Subject: Re: Synchronous FAT Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:06:12 +0800 Message-ID: <2cd57c90050613180610d8e2f5@mail.gmail.com> References: <1114607741.12617.4.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> <1114618748.12617.23.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> <1114673528.3483.2.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> <20050428003450.51687b65.akpm@osdl.org> <1115209055.8559.12.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> <20050504130450.7c90a422.akpm@osdl.org> <42AD9BED.4070601@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Coywolf Qi Hunt Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.194]:46204 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261183AbVFNBGN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:06:13 -0400 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o25so66077nfa for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:06:12 -0700 (PDT) To: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" In-Reply-To: <42AD9BED.4070601@yandex.ru> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 6/13/05, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote: > Did somebody try to work with vfat mounted with -osync flag in > linux-2.6.12-rc6 or linux-2.6.12-rc2 ? Is it supposed to be OK? >>From the manual, "the sync option today has effect only for ext2, ext3 and ufs". -- Coywolf Qi Hunt http://ahbl.org/~coywolf/