From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finished making slub perform as well
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 01:44:29 +0900
Message-ID: <2f11576a0808150944g678f1b8di1c4d50de7358b306@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20080805210125.A897.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
	 <48986AC6.5030406@linux-foundation.org>
	 <20080813194222.E77F.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
	 <48A2DD2C.3090602@linux-foundation.org>
	 <2f11576a0808130714k2cd031c4nd6eea3506831cac9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <48A2F030.9080301@linux-foundation.org>
	 <2f11576a0808130805s6963e2a4mbb82ad7221cf80a2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <48A48B00.1090703@linux-foundation.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@wil.cx>,
	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Mel Gorman" <mel@skynet.ie>, andi@firstfloor.org,
	"Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>
To: "Christoph Lameter" <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.28]:16348 "EHLO
	yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754436AbYHOQob (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:44:31 -0400
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so776584yxm.1
        for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <48A48B00.1090703@linux-foundation.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

> This is a NUMA system right?

True.
My system is

CPU: ia64 x8
MEM: 8G (4G x 2node)

> Then we have another mechanism that will avoid
> off node memory references by allocating new slabs. Can you set the
> node_defrag parameter to 0? (Noted by Adrian).

Please let me know that operations ?