From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, teigland@redhat.com,
rpeterso@redhat.com, agruenba@redhat.com,
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna@kernel.org,
chuck.lever@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 3/7] lockd: introduce safe async lock op
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:43:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30aa456827011eabf4b095d66cba2ac23491627a.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814211116.3224759-4-aahringo@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 17:11 -0400, Alexander Aring wrote:
> This patch reverts mostly commit 40595cdc93ed ("nfs: block notification
> on fs with its own ->lock") and introduces an EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK
> export flag to signal that the "own ->lock" implementation supports
> async lock requests. The only main user is DLM that is used by GFS2 and
> OCFS2 filesystem. Those implement their own lock() implementation and
> return FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED as return value. Since commit 40595cdc93ed
> ("nfs: block notification on fs with its own ->lock") the DLM
> implementation were never updated. This patch should prepare for DLM
> to set the EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK export flag and update the DLM
> plock implementation regarding to it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/lockd/svclock.c | 5 ++---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> include/linux/exportfs.h | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
> index 1e74a578d7de..b8bd2b841ee1 100644
> --- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c
> +++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
> @@ -449,9 +449,7 @@ nlmsvc_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
> struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_lock *lock, int wait,
> struct nlm_cookie *cookie, int reclaim)
> {
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG)
> struct inode *inode = nlmsvc_file_inode(file);
> -#endif
> struct nlm_block *block = NULL;
> int error;
> int mode;
> @@ -465,7 +463,8 @@ nlmsvc_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
> (long long)lock->fl.fl_end,
> wait);
>
> - if (nlmsvc_file_file(file)->f_op->lock) {
> + if (!export_op_support_safe_async_lock(inode->i_sb->s_export_op,
> + nlmsvc_file_file(file)->f_op)) {
> async_block = wait;
> wait = 0;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 3aefbad4cc09..14ca06424ff1 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -7430,6 +7430,7 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl = NULL;
> struct file_lock *file_lock = NULL;
> struct file_lock *conflock = NULL;
> + struct super_block *sb;
> __be32 status = 0;
> int lkflg;
> int err;
> @@ -7451,6 +7452,7 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> dprintk("NFSD: nfsd4_lock: permission denied!\n");
> return status;
> }
> + sb = cstate->current_fh.fh_dentry->d_sb;
>
> if (lock->lk_is_new) {
> if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
> @@ -7502,7 +7504,9 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> fp = lock_stp->st_stid.sc_file;
> switch (lock->lk_type) {
> case NFS4_READW_LT:
> - if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
> + if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate) ||
> + export_op_support_safe_async_lock(sb->s_export_op,
> + nf->nf_file->f_op))
> fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
> fallthrough;
> case NFS4_READ_LT:
> @@ -7514,7 +7518,9 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> fl_type = F_RDLCK;
> break;
> case NFS4_WRITEW_LT:
> - if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
> + if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate) ||
> + export_op_support_safe_async_lock(sb->s_export_op,
> + nf->nf_file->f_op))
> fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
> fallthrough;
> case NFS4_WRITE_LT:
> @@ -7542,7 +7548,8 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> * for file locks), so don't attempt blocking lock notifications
> * on those filesystems:
> */
> - if (nf->nf_file->f_op->lock)
> + if (!export_op_support_safe_async_lock(sb->s_export_op,
> + nf->nf_file->f_op))
> fl_flags &= ~FL_SLEEP;
>
> nbl = find_or_allocate_block(lock_sop, &fp->fi_fhandle, nn);
> diff --git a/include/linux/exportfs.h b/include/linux/exportfs.h
> index 11fbd0ee1370..10358a93cdc1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/exportfs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/exportfs.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> #define LINUX_EXPORTFS_H 1
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
>
> struct dentry;
> struct iattr;
> @@ -224,9 +225,16 @@ struct export_operations {
> atomic attribute updates
> */
> #define EXPORT_OP_FLUSH_ON_CLOSE (0x20) /* fs flushes file data on close */
> +#define EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK (0x40) /* fs can do async lock request */
> unsigned long flags;
> };
>
> +static inline bool export_op_support_safe_async_lock(const struct export_operations *export_ops,
> + const struct file_operations *f_op)
> +{
> + return (export_ops->flags & EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK) || !f_op->lock;
> +}
> +
> extern int exportfs_encode_inode_fh(struct inode *inode, struct fid *fid,
> int *max_len, struct inode *parent,
> int flags);
This seems like a reasonable approach, in principle.
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-16 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-14 21:11 [RFCv2 0/7] fs: nfs: async lock request changes Alexander Aring
2023-08-14 21:11 ` [RFCv2 1/7] lockd: fix race in async lock request handling Alexander Aring
2023-08-15 17:49 ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-15 18:21 ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-17 18:39 ` Alexander Aring
2023-08-17 18:36 ` Alexander Aring
2023-08-14 21:11 ` [RFCv2 2/7] lockd: FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED only on FL_SLEEP Alexander Aring
2023-08-16 11:37 ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-17 1:40 ` Alexander Aring
2023-08-14 21:11 ` [RFCv2 3/7] lockd: introduce safe async lock op Alexander Aring
2023-08-16 11:43 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-08-14 21:11 ` [RFCv2 4/7] locks: update lock callback documentation Alexander Aring
2023-08-16 12:01 ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-17 1:23 ` Alexander Aring
2023-08-14 21:11 ` [RFCv2 5/7] dlm: use fl_owner from lockd Alexander Aring
2023-08-16 12:02 ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-14 21:11 ` [RFCv2 6/7] dlm: use FL_SLEEP to check if blocking request Alexander Aring
2023-08-16 13:07 ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-17 1:19 ` Alexander Aring
2023-08-17 11:27 ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-17 13:02 ` Alexander Aring
2023-08-14 21:11 ` [RFCv2 7/7] dlm: implement EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK Alexander Aring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30aa456827011eabf4b095d66cba2ac23491627a.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rpeterso@redhat.com \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).