From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp>
Subject: Re: UnionMount status?
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:59:36 +0900
Message-ID: <31059.1269032376@jrobl>
References: <a5d587fb1003181721m49d2debey48c6a6acc326a9a6@mail.gmail.com> <17402.1268979040@jrobl> <a5d587fb1003191328w539ec12eh7e75cbec942ac485@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vaurora@redhat.com
To: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mtoichi12.ns.itscom.net ([219.110.2.182]:54326 "EHLO
	mtoichi12.ns.itscom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751411Ab0CSVAE (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:00:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <a5d587fb1003191328w539ec12eh7e75cbec942ac485@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>


Michal Suchanek:
> You are right, the latest aufs patch applies cleanly and compiles on
> top of 2.6.34-rc1.

But it has to be one or two weeks behind from the mainline.
It is better to check the last commit in the aufs git tree.


J. R. Okajima