From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH] CRED: Fix regression in cap_capable() as shown up by sys_faccessat() [ver #2] Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 11:59:38 +0000 Message-ID: <32481.1230897578@redhat.com> References: <20090102051905.GC1073@fieldses.org> <20090101235332.GA31840@fieldses.org> <24959.1230694093@redhat.com> <20081230134248.GA30124@lst.de> <21275.1230736542@redhat.com> <29449.1230859152@redhat.com> Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig , jmorris@namei.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41916 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756974AbZABMAW (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 07:00:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090102051905.GC1073@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: J. Bruce Fields wrote: > No. I started bisecting, and it does appear to be a regression from the > cred patches, but at some point in the middle there it hangs on boot (a > softlockup report blames a spinlock in set_groups). Do you remember which patch you were at? David