From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao@huaweicloud.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
"zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
"wangzhaolong (A)" <wangzhaolong1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] potential deadlock in inode evicting under the inode lru traversing context on ext4 and ubifs
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 10:29:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <346993f2-87f6-e20f-8f5a-d19f84c1604c@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240712143708.GA151742@mit.edu>
在 2024/7/12 22:37, Theodore Ts'o 写道:
>> Problem description
>> ===================
>>
>> The inode reclaiming process(See function prune_icache_sb) collects all
>> reclaimable inodes and mark them with I_FREEING flag at first, at that
>> time, other processes will be stuck if they try getting these inodes(See
>> function find_inode_fast), then the reclaiming process destroy the
>> inodes by function dispose_list().
>> Some filesystems(eg. ext4 with ea_inode feature, ubifs with xattr) may
>> do inode lookup in the inode evicting callback function, if the inode
>> lookup is operated under the inode lru traversing context, deadlock
>> problems may happen.
>>
>> Case 1: In function ext4_evict_inode(), the ea inode lookup could happen
>> if ea_inode feature is enabled, the lookup process will be stuck under
>> the evicting context like this:
>>
>> 1. File A has inode i_reg and an ea inode i_ea
>> 2. getfattr(A, xattr_buf) // i_ea is added into lru // lru->i_ea
>> 3. Then, following three processes running like this:
>>
>> PA PB
>> echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>> shrink_slab
>> prune_dcache_sb
>> // i_reg is added into lru, lru->i_ea->i_reg
>> prune_icache_sb
>> list_lru_walk_one
>> inode_lru_isolate
>> i_ea->i_state |= I_FREEING // set inode state
>> i_ea->i_state |= I_FREEING // set inode state
> Um, I don't see how this can happen. If the ea_inode is in use,
> i_count will be greater than zero, and hence the inode will never be
> go down the rest of the path in inode_lru_inode():
The counter of ea_inode could become zero before the file inode,
according to the following process:
path_getxattr
user_path_at(&path) // get file dentry and file inode
getxattr
ext4_xattr_get
ext4_xattr_ibody_get
ext4_xattr_inode_get
ext4_xattr_inode_iget(&ea_inode) // ea_inode->i_count = 1
iput(ea_inode) // ea_inode->i_count = 0, put it into lru
path_put(&path); // put file dentry and file inode
>
> if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count) ||
> ...) {
> list_lru_isolate(lru, &inode->i_lru);
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> this_cpu_dec(nr_unused);
> return LRU_REMOVED;
> }
>
> Do you have an actual reproduer which triggers this? Or would this
> happen be any chance something that was dreamed up with DEPT?
The reproducer is in the second half of the ariticle, along with some of
the solutions we tried.
Reproducer:
===========
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219022
About solutions
===============
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-13 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-12 6:27 [BUG REPORT] potential deadlock in inode evicting under the inode lru traversing context on ext4 and ubifs Zhihao Cheng
2024-07-12 14:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-07-13 2:29 ` Zhihao Cheng [this message]
2024-07-18 3:04 ` Ryder Wang
2024-07-18 7:30 ` Zhihao Cheng
2024-07-18 13:40 ` Jan Kara
2024-07-19 3:21 ` Zhihao Cheng
2024-07-20 10:42 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-08-05 1:29 ` Zhihao Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=346993f2-87f6-e20f-8f5a-d19f84c1604c@huaweicloud.com \
--to=chengzhihao@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wangzhaolong1@huawei.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).