public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Xiaole He <hexiaole1994@126.com>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,  brauner@kernel.org
Cc: jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] fs/super.c: Add NULL check for type in iterate_supers_type
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 07:38:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35a8d2093ba4c4b60ce07f1efc17ff2595f6964d.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250402034529.12642-1-hexiaole1994@126.com>

On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 11:45 +0800, Xiaole He wrote:
> The first several lines of iterate_supers_type are below:
> 
> 1 void iterate_supers_type(struct file_system_type *type,
> 2 	void (*f)(struct super_block *, void *), void *arg)
> 3 {
> 4 	struct super_block *sb, *p = NULL;
> 5
> 6 	spin_lock(&sb_lock);
> 7 	hlist_for_each_entry(sb, &type->fs_supers, s_instances) {
> 8 	...
> 9 }
> 
> The iterate_super_type is a exported symbol, and if
> iterate_supers_type is called with type of NULL, then there will be a
> NULL pointer dereference of argument type in line 7.

filesystem_type is an argument to alloc_super, which the filesystems
code always fills in.  If a filesystem passed a NULL type to the
context, the initialization code would crash on a NULL deref (iterating
type->fs_supers) which makes what you're checking for here an
impossible condition, doesn't it?

Regards,

James


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-02 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-02  3:45 [PATCH v1] fs/super.c: Add NULL check for type in iterate_supers_type Xiaole He
2025-04-02 11:38 ` James Bottomley [this message]
     [not found]   ` <4ee2fdcb.1854a.195f9828c86.Coremail.hexiaole1994@126.com>
2025-04-03  2:47     ` Al Viro
     [not found]       ` <75a45193.18746.195f9a088c4.Coremail.hexiaole1994@126.com>
2025-04-03  3:50         ` Al Viro
2025-04-03  8:01 ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35a8d2093ba4c4b60ce07f1efc17ff2595f6964d.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=hexiaole1994@126.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox