From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BA061AE005 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738158136; cv=none; b=Kgua1n4cyuj38V54moBWN7KaKwmrdsG6emTudQizSKRiLam441MYRt6orVNS2+OW2kvnuyJZguS4UcXLViulDWGnRIt3dIdn3TdyIS+QEFFdrKzgtqVRxDpHBJ61qL4y4diOVjESlQ5zukd/J6RcYvK6toPwl+DVXxXUVU9eha4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738158136; c=relaxed/simple; bh=i8T95nJXLBOq8RRYni4Dg1Qv3WQq/9E0UXSEtlhodtg=; h=From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=m9GMmQP5WfT6gQcghFw43hnYBIt3yLOAWzTTaFP17uGx/S9f2uqpiMA2qooMjwdN6pzUmqNV74jzqujTsxYzS3dxdagbJLoS5SuqGpV4ZOMMUoLOuTP+buZ45JHU1lutlX4s4kMajoKPTqlmUbaW3qvoj1Tb7jjXxO0y2QfjBiI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=dV8Viu9g; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dV8Viu9g" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1738158133; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lPZyIoL59GRKxbPwbntwWlB7zyoAQq3uGrBd57InD2I=; b=dV8Viu9gSY8THvEVJq9bhl85BBkkuBmQ6fnQIvwMbB0kCJoNORSXHABbyPNmSpjr3w4MsK cssvZpbRxzBN+NvBzDdSPix/GkSa6IXMjNtycV+umSo/MVTo+IQ1+zCPXrAJE/xQ/g771V MBB9T1yByPV2XVX438erFEL+y3DNUhw= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-248-W3a-G6e0NtOETTLl5R4fAg-1; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:42:10 -0500 X-MC-Unique: W3a-G6e0NtOETTLl5R4fAg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: W3a-G6e0NtOETTLl5R4fAg Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC9D819560B9; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.56]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F00418008DC; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <3469649.1738083455@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <3406497.1738080815@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20250117035044.23309-1-slava@dubeyko.com> <988267.1737365634@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <3532744.1738094469@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <3541166.1738103654@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Alex Markuze Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Viacheslav Dubeyko , "idryomov@gmail.com" , "slava@dubeyko.com" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: Fix kernel crash in generic/397 test Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3669174.1738158126.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:42:06 +0000 Message-ID: <3669175.1738158126@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Alex Markuze wrote: > FYI, This the set of fscrypt of tests that keep failing, w/o this patch. > Many of these revoke keys mid I/O. > generic/397 > generic/421 #Test revoking an encryption key during concurrent I/O. > generic/429. #Test revoking an encryption key during concurrent I/O. > And additional fscrypt races > generic/440. #Test revoking an encryption key during concurrent I/O. > generic/580 #Testing the different keyring policies - also revokes > keys on open files > generic/593 #Test adding a key to a filesystem's fscrypt keyring via > an "fscrypt-provisioning" keyring key. > generic/595 #Test revoking an encryption key during concurrent I/O. I presume I don't need to add a key and that these do it for themselves? David