From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from embla.dev.snart.me (embla.dev.snart.me [54.252.183.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2C4539F160 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=54.252.183.203 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777541082; cv=none; b=khJ+bs21KhDCNEU+QzuOcr5c+2XASYZ+wSayp/T7x5RAzw8voUZGC+3lsZN7Kpnc9xurVogEZ2TSCnBHgziDa2XXqfkg0RFmhGKEW6f5iixmjafJLdLQTqckhS5rqRp6fqfFOvRMHGBTCcoZRm75dYPvztIC87zFZVRx6srRObU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777541082; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3pcjs+Fj+FpqLkJ7AYC1J7F9n/lNK9BMbvJLPovhZR8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fyefsfaI1gWtp62CjqPu8zA+QlUH6CHAy2JnJadYf6cEvlOUYZGNDnBGzbThTl+5r8PwUQrX6+3Zm1xSOe4JE5V7FmYT/JqKCmKE2eVsCXt9vMWY02GuEUUp5+rk0DRtaz5eURVKqJMQ4yp6lzbKXW+KC0M0A9H7krKHV5qjto0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=dev.snart.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev.snart.me; arc=none smtp.client-ip=54.252.183.203 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=dev.snart.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev.snart.me Received: from embla.dev.snart.me (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by embla.dev.snart.me (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FA91D459; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([182.226.25.243]) by embla.dev.snart.me with ESMTPSA id PtKxDtcf82mI4QUA8KYfjw (envelope-from ); Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:24:39 +0000 Message-ID: <383f2d82-5f31-49df-9c00-b76b6fa45370@dev.snart.me> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:24:38 +0900 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] exfat: more pedantic upcase table validity check To: "Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com" , Namjae Jeon , Sungjong Seo Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20260428235038.93816-1-dxdt@dev.snart.me> <20260428235038.93816-5-dxdt@dev.snart.me> From: David Timber Content-Language: en-US, ko Autocrypt: addr=dxdt@dev.snart.me; keydata= xjMEYmJg1hYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAf5E+ri1XLtjqYbZdHOyc8oS+1/XJ5bSlbx5WHXmVBZzN IERhdmlkIFRpbWJlciA8ZHhkdEBkZXYuc25hcnQubWU+wpQEExYKADwWIQQn/Jn96EMUaIoF X+T/ldyyrZpWaAUCYmJg1gIbAwULCQgHAgMiAgEGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgcCF4AACgkQ/5Xc sq2aVmjJZwD8COjPlUwccrlRvbNQ6f87DWchtYO0o8W2DNRM3RLps0EA/jEhIbRV6AsyC8jr 30Ut3aJ3/mO/6G4sLj7OvkEEBH0MzjgEYmJg1hIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQFpgtIgaByv9lIEY EmpavMO0pYjtu7TMJynwdnGYkN9LAwEIB8J4BBgWCgAgFiEEJ/yZ/ehDFGiKBV/k/5Xcsq2a VmgFAmJiYNYCGwwACgkQ/5Xcsq2aVmhFCwEA0kM9VyYB4bLCM7+SuXUUH+5Ec99Nj4RXxFad Key9GuwA/2BZK6bNyrLSfEk2JDRoskqf7OIL0wa6JOD5SrBnMe8E In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/30/26 16:58, Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com wrote: >> static int exfat_load_upcase_table(struct super_block *sb, >> - sector_t sector, unsigned long long num_sectors, >> - unsigned int utbl_checksum) >> + unsigned long long tbl_size, sector_t sector, >> + unsigned long long num_sectors, unsigned int utbl_checksum) > After adding the parameter tbl_size, the parameter num_sectors is no > longer needed. Change the func signature? I'd like to hear Jeon's opinion on this.