From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69C7C47257 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 00:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F41020CC7 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 00:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728886AbgEJAgP (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2020 20:36:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:46837 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726778AbgEJAgO (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2020 20:36:14 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id q124so2700033pgq.13; Sat, 09 May 2020 17:36:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SQF8VGNw/LWoe9FfZGxpzTCfdvJXZRTz9yGixScGhPs=; b=qfvcu0K3EvzWUREclK/jjWSv3eUWCHQjL7qjT3vjJqMi4635F4NwrG/3O51IAT1HMF JEKE91L3MA6mKHRHA6flh5vEcJUr8WQNiqJ6RRRgQyr8jespEGnQ23b/r6r/nNPN2Cpq Fp8gyWyF8CmclGQLzKZ0tQGc41wXaXPniBJFwMqRu0/HbtgF44wLbqJ4i6ClfiPas7Xm qO7etrJlOBRs5MTw2B9QOPi8EsDaTq4496iBKTjFE9POjD0U/R9udZ+a+PRig6l6rT1y Z3VhZmDTkX2IBqkOhisbClOemXZIzq/7OGVf+5Csrh/yPjASUF1Be3Lh2O/mjTgaZeDB Uo5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYhtSvFybeX4JjaL6E6pzEfm2kow+2aOnK26M9tjO8FgKZ12EqD 8zqvGOjJSSwflqB0pURA0V8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLzWG+D3I3lGRvqUjjthvsCMHM3xjJIhlNwyoTH7tORaG4skYeDsbtO5wgVmwoRSn49F59p9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a63:7219:: with SMTP id n25mr8505744pgc.358.1589070972603; Sat, 09 May 2020 17:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4000:d7:8ef:746a:4fe7:1df? ([2601:647:4000:d7:8ef:746a:4fe7:1df]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z6sm5386018pfb.87.2020.05.09.17.36.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 May 2020 17:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal To: Luis Chamberlain , axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, ming.lei@redhat.com, nstange@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: mhocko@suse.com, yukuai3@huawei.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval , Hannes Reinecke , Michal Hocko , Christoph Hellwig References: <20200509031058.8239-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20200509031058.8239-2-mcgrof@kernel.org> From: Bart Van Assche Autocrypt: addr=bvanassche@acm.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFSOu4oBCADcRWxVUvkkvRmmwTwIjIJvZOu6wNm+dz5AF4z0FHW2KNZL3oheO3P8UZWr LQOrCfRcK8e/sIs2Y2D3Lg/SL7qqbMehGEYcJptu6mKkywBfoYbtBkVoJ/jQsi2H0vBiiCOy fmxMHIPcYxaJdXxrOG2UO4B60Y/BzE6OrPDT44w4cZA9DH5xialliWU447Bts8TJNa3lZKS1 AvW1ZklbvJfAJJAwzDih35LxU2fcWbmhPa7EO2DCv/LM1B10GBB/oQB5kvlq4aA2PSIWkqz4 3SI5kCPSsygD6wKnbRsvNn2mIACva6VHdm62A7xel5dJRfpQjXj2snd1F/YNoNc66UUTABEB AAG0JEJhcnQgVmFuIEFzc2NoZSA8YnZhbmFzc2NoZUBhY20ub3JnPokBOQQTAQIAIwUCVI67 igIbAwcLCQgHAwIBBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEHFcPTXFzhAJ8QkH/1AdXblKL65M Y1Zk1bYKnkAb4a98LxCPm/pJBilvci6boefwlBDZ2NZuuYWYgyrehMB5H+q+Kq4P0IBbTqTa jTPAANn62A6jwJ0FnCn6YaM9TZQjM1F7LoDX3v+oAkaoXuq0dQ4hnxQNu792bi6QyVdZUvKc macVFVgfK9n04mL7RzjO3f+X4midKt/s+G+IPr4DGlrq+WH27eDbpUR3aYRk8EgbgGKvQFdD CEBFJi+5ZKOArmJVBSk21RHDpqyz6Vit3rjep7c1SN8s7NhVi9cjkKmMDM7KYhXkWc10lKx2 RTkFI30rkDm4U+JpdAd2+tP3tjGf9AyGGinpzE2XY1K5AQ0EVI67igEIAKiSyd0nECrgz+H5 PcFDGYQpGDMTl8MOPCKw/F3diXPuj2eql4xSbAdbUCJzk2ETif5s3twT2ER8cUTEVOaCEUY3 eOiaFgQ+nGLx4BXqqGewikPJCe+UBjFnH1m2/IFn4T9jPZkV8xlkKmDUqMK5EV9n3eQLkn5g lco+FepTtmbkSCCjd91EfThVbNYpVQ5ZjdBCXN66CKyJDMJ85HVr5rmXG/nqriTh6cv1l1Js T7AFvvPjUPknS6d+BETMhTkbGzoyS+sywEsQAgA+BMCxBH4LvUmHYhpS+W6CiZ3ZMxjO8Hgc ++w1mLeRUvda3i4/U8wDT3SWuHcB3DWlcppECLkAEQEAAYkBHwQYAQIACQUCVI67igIbDAAK CRBxXD01xc4QCZ4dB/0QrnEasxjM0PGeXK5hcZMT9Eo998alUfn5XU0RQDYdwp6/kMEXMdmT oH0F0xB3SQ8WVSXA9rrc4EBvZruWQ+5/zjVrhhfUAx12CzL4oQ9Ro2k45daYaonKTANYG22y //x8dLe2Fv1By4SKGhmzwH87uXxbTJAUxiWIi1np0z3/RDnoVyfmfbbL1DY7zf2hYXLLzsJR mSsED/1nlJ9Oq5fALdNEPgDyPUerqHxcmIub+pF0AzJoYHK5punqpqfGmqPbjxrJLPJfHVKy goMj5DlBMoYqEgpbwdUYkH6QdizJJCur4icy8GUNbisFYABeoJ91pnD4IGei3MTdvINSZI5e Message-ID: <3969cc50-eef7-0b39-58eb-a19535a61d15@acm.org> Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 17:36:09 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200509031058.8239-2-mcgrof@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-05-08 20:10, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > We revert back to synchronous request_queue removal because asynchronous > removal creates a regression with expected userspace interaction with > several drivers. An example is when removing the loopback driver, one > uses ioctls from userspace to do so, but upon return and if successful, > one expects the device to be removed. Likewise if one races to add another > device the new one may not be added as it is still being removed. This was > expected behavior before and it now fails as the device is still present > and busy still. Moving to asynchronous request_queue removal could have > broken many scripts which relied on the removal to have been completed if > there was no error. Document this expectation as well so that this > doesn't regress userspace again. Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche