From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch] 512-byte alignment for O_DIRECT I/O Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 09:54:03 -0700 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3DA30DAB.BDED8ABE@digeo.com> References: <3DA211B8.325C32BA@digeo.com> <1034094869.16054.7.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lkml , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Badari Pulavarty Return-path: To: Steve Lord List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Steve Lord wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 17:59, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > This patch from Badari is passing all testing now. > > > ..... > > +++ 2.5.41-akpm/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_aops.c Mon Oct 7 15:50:21 2002 > > @@ -688,8 +688,8 @@ linvfs_direct_IO( > > { > > struct inode *inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_mapping->host; > > > > - return generic_direct_IO(rw, inode, iov, offset, nr_segs, > > - linvfs_get_blocks_direct); > > + return generic_direct_IO(rw, inode, inode->i_sb->s_bdev, > > + iov, offset, nr_segs, linvfs_get_blocks_direct); > > } > > > > STATIC int > > > > Actually this part is broken for XFS - it will work for most cases, > but not for realtime files, in this case there is another bdev involved. > I just have to work out how to get to it from here...... the getblock > code knows enough to set it in the bh, but at this level we do not. > Well we can pass in NULL for the while, get the old behaviour. But yes, I'd prefer to only ever use the get_block() value. It's really messy though - things like deferring the check of the aligment of all the iovec segments until we've run get_block... Maybe we should ask the caller to pass in the alignment itself, just 512, 2048, etc?