From: jshankar <jshankar@CS.ColoState.EDU>
To: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: ext3 file system performance : file size and transfer size
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 13:45:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F6DBD81@webmail.colostate.edu> (raw)
Hello,
I was measuring ext3 file system performance using iozone benchmark.
What i noticed was , for transfer size less than 512K there was a better
perfomance for read and write than larger transfer size.
But for file size the readings didn't seem to exhibit any particular
characteristics.
Does the file size play any impact on the performance characteristics. I
understand that if the file size is small, caching plays an impact.
Please let me know your opinion.
Thanks
Jayshankar
reply other threads:[~2003-09-01 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F6DBD81@webmail.colostate.edu \
--to=jshankar@cs.colostate.edu \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox