From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
djwong@kernel.org, Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] ext4: Add atomic block write documentation
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 09:55:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b69be2c-51b7-4090-b267-0d213d0cecae@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3893b9f5ad70317abae72046e81e4c180af91bf.1747337952.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
On 15/05/2025 20:50, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
thanks for adding this info
> Application Interface
Should we put this into a common file, as it is just not relevant to ext4?
Or move this file to a common location, and have separate sections for
ext4 and xfs? This would save having scattered files for instructions.
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +Applications can use the ``pwritev2()`` system call with the ``RWF_ATOMIC`` flag
> +to perform atomic writes:
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> + pwritev2(fd, iov, iovcnt, offset, RWF_ATOMIC);
> +
> +The write must be aligned to the filesystem's block size and not exceed the
> +filesystem's maximum atomic write unit size.
> +See ``generic_atomic_write_valid()`` for more details.
> +
> +``statx()`` system call with ``STATX_WRITE_ATOMIC`` flag can provides following
> +details:
> +
> + * ``stx_atomic_write_unit_min``: Minimum size of an atomic write request.
> + * ``stx_atomic_write_unit_max``: Maximum size of an atomic write request.
> + * ``stx_atomic_write_segments_max``: Upper limit for segments. The number of
> + separate memory buffers that can be gathered into a write operation
there will also be stx_atomic_write_unit_max_opt, as queued for 6.16
For HW-only support, I think that it is ok to just return same as
stx_atomic_write_unit_max when we can atomic write > 1 filesystem block
> + (e.g., the iovcnt parameter for IOV_ITER).
> Currently, this is always set to one.
JFYI, for xfs supporting filesystem-based atomic writes only, i.e. no HW
support, we could set this to a higher value
> +
> +The STATX_ATTR_WRITE_ATOMIC flag in ``statx->attributes`` is set if atomic
> +writes are supported.
> +
> +.. _atomic_write_bdev_support:
> +
> +Hardware Support
> +----------------
> +
> +The underlying storage device must support atomic write operations.
> +Modern NVMe and SCSI devices often provide this capability.
> +The Linux kernel exposes this information through sysfs:
> +
> +* ``/sys/block/<device>/queue/atomic_write_unit_min`` - Minimum atomic write size
> +* ``/sys/block/<device>/queue/atomic_write_unit_max`` - Maximum atomic write size
there is also the max bytes and boundary files. I am not sure if it was
intentional to omit them.
> +
> +Nonzero values for these attributes indicate that the device supports
> +atomic writes.
> +
> +See Also
thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 19:50 [PATCH v5 0/7] ext4: Add multi-fsblock atomic write support with bigalloc Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-05-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] ext4: Document an edge case for overwrites Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-05-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] ext4: Check if inode uses extents in ext4_inode_can_atomic_write() Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-05-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] ext4: Make ext4_meta_trans_blocks() non-static for later use Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-05-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] ext4: Add support for EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_QUERY_LEAF_BLOCKS Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-05-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] ext4: Add multi-fsblock atomic write support with bigalloc Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-05-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] ext4: Enable support for ext4 multi-fsblock atomic write using bigalloc Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-05-15 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] ext4: Add atomic block write documentation Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-05-16 8:55 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-05-16 12:19 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-05-16 13:05 ` John Garry
2025-05-16 13:31 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-05-16 14:48 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-05-16 15:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-16 18:13 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-05-16 14:36 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-16 14:15 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-19 10:07 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] ext4: Add multi-fsblock atomic write support with bigalloc Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-19 15:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-05-20 14:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b69be2c-51b7-4090-b267-0d213d0cecae@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).