From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Theodore T'so <tytso@mit.edu>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain inode i_m/ctime
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:47:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b7a224853e2e0557d55e98f171f8b24999c040b.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523101723.xmy7mylbczhki6aa@quack3>
On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 12:17 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 23-05-23 12:02:40, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 18-05-23 07:47:35, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > The VFS always uses coarse-grained timestamp updates for filling out the
> > > ctime and mtime after a change. This has the benefit of allowing
> > > filesystems to optimize away a lot metadata updates, down to around 1
> > > per jiffy, even when a file is under heavy writes.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, this has always been an issue when we're exporting via
> > > NFSv3, which relies on timestamps to validate caches. Even with NFSv4, a
> > > lot of exported filesystems don't properly support a change attribute
> > > and are subject to the same problems with timestamp granularity. Other
> > > applications have similar issues (e.g backup applications).
> > >
> > > Switching to always using fine-grained timestamps would improve the
> > > situation, but that becomes rather expensive, as the underlying
> > > filesystem will have to log a lot more metadata updates.
> > >
> > > What we need is a way to only use fine-grained timestamps when they are
> > > being actively queried.
> > >
> > > The kernel always stores normalized ctime values, so only the first 30
> > > bits of the tv_nsec field are ever used. Whenever the mtime changes, the
> > > ctime must also change.
> > >
> > > Use the 31st bit of the ctime tv_nsec field to indicate that something
> > > has queried the inode for the i_mtime or i_ctime. When this flag is set,
> > > on the next timestamp update, the kernel can fetch a fine-grained
> > > timestamp instead of the usual coarse-grained one.
> > >
> > > This patch adds the infrastructure this scheme. Filesytems can opt
> > > into it by setting the FS_MULTIGRAIN_TS flag in the fstype.
> > >
> > > Later patches will convert individual filesystems over to use it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> >
> > So there are two things I dislike about this series because I think they
> > are fragile:
> >
> > 1) If we have a filesystem supporting multigrain ts and someone
> > accidentally directly uses the value of inode->i_ctime, he can get bogus
> > value (with QUERIED flag). This mistake is very easy to do. So I think we
> > should rename i_ctime to something like __i_ctime and always use accessor
> > function for it.
> >
> > 2) As I already commented in a previous version of the series, the scheme
> > with just one flag for both ctime and mtime and flag getting cleared in
> > current_time() relies on the fact that filesystems always do an equivalent
> > of:
> >
> > inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = current_time();
> >
> > Otherwise we can do coarse grained update where we should have done a fine
> > grained one. Filesystems often update timestamps like this but not
> > universally. Grepping shows some instances where only inode->i_mtime is set
> > from current_time() e.g. in autofs or bfs. Again a mistake that is rather
> > easy to make and results in subtle issues. I think this would be also
> > nicely solved by renaming i_ctime to __i_ctime and using a function to set
> > ctime. Mtime could then be updated with inode->i_mtime = ctime_peek().
> >
> > I understand this is quite some churn but a very mechanical one that could
> > be just done with Coccinelle and a few manual fixups. So IMHO it is worth
> > the more robust result.
>
> Also as I'm thinking about it your current scheme is slightly racy. Suppose
> the filesystem does:
>
> CPU1 CPU2
>
> statx()
> inode->i_ctime = current_time()
> current_mg_time()
> nsec = atomic_long_fetch_andnot(QUERIED, &inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec)
> nsec = atomic_long_fetch_or(QUERIED, &inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec)
> if (nsec & QUERIED) - not set
> ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64(&now)
> return timestamp_truncate(now, inode);
> - QUERIED flag in the inode->i_ctime gets overwritten by the assignment
> => we need not update ctime due to granularity although it was queried
>
> One more reason to use explicit function to update inode->i_ctime ;)
Thinking about this some more, I think we can fix the race you pointed
out by just not clearing the queried flag when we fetch the
i_ctime.tv_nsec field when we're updating.
So, instead of atomic_long_fetch_andnot, we'd just want to use an
atomic_long_fetch there, and just let the eventual assignment of
inode->__i_ctime.tv_nsec be what clears the flag.
Any task that goes to update the time during the interim window will
fetch a fine-grained time, but that's what we want anyway.
Since you bring up races though, there are a couple of other things we
should be aware of. Note that both problems exist today too:
1) it's possible for two tasks to race in such a way that the ctime goes
backward. There's no synchronization between tasks doing the updating,
so an older time can overwrite a newer one. I think you'd need a pretty
tight race to observe this though.
2) it's possible to fetch a "torn" timestamp out of the inode.
timespec64 is two words, and we don't order its loads or stores. We
could consider adding a seqcount_t and some barriers and fixing it that
way. I'm not sure it's worth it though, given that we haven't worried
about this in the past.
For now, I propose that we ignore both problems, unless and until we can
prove that they are more than theoretical.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-13 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-18 11:47 [PATCH v4 0/9] fs: implement multigrain timestamps Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] fs: pass the request_mask to generic_fillattr Jeff Layton
2023-05-23 9:17 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain inode i_m/ctime Jeff Layton
2023-05-20 20:06 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-05-21 2:21 ` Boqun Feng
2023-05-21 8:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-21 8:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-23 10:02 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-23 10:17 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-23 10:56 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-23 11:01 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-23 11:15 ` Jeff Layton
2023-06-13 19:47 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-05-23 10:38 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-23 10:40 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-23 12:46 ` Jan Kara
2023-06-13 13:09 ` Jeff Layton
2023-06-14 6:29 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] overlayfs: allow it to handle multigrain timestamps Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] nfsd: ensure we use ctime_peek to grab the inode->i_ctime Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 13:43 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-18 15:31 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-19 10:36 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-19 11:22 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] ksmbd: use ctime_peek to grab the ctime out of the inode Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] tmpfs: add support for multigrain timestamps Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] xfs: switch to " Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] ext4: convert " Jeff Layton
2023-05-20 20:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] btrfs: " Jeff Layton
2023-05-22 9:56 ` David Sterba
2023-05-22 10:08 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-22 10:53 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-22 9:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] fs: implement " Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b7a224853e2e0557d55e98f171f8b24999c040b.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).