* Why the third parameter of "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" is __u32?
@ 2007-07-26 14:54 Yan Zheng
2007-07-26 14:57 ` Yan Zheng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yan Zheng @ 2007-07-26 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel
Hi all
The third parameter of "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" is used to receive
physical block number. I think the data type should be "ext4_fsblk_t".
Thanks in advance.
YZ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Why the third parameter of "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" is __u32?
2007-07-26 14:54 Why the third parameter of "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" is __u32? Yan Zheng
@ 2007-07-26 14:57 ` Yan Zheng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yan Zheng @ 2007-07-26 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel
sorry, I mean the fourth parameter of "ext4_ext_put_in_cache.
2007/7/26, Yan Zheng <yanzheng@21cn.com>:
> Hi all
>
> The third parameter of "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" is used to receive
> physical block number. I think the data type should be "ext4_fsblk_t".
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> YZ
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-26 14:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-26 14:54 Why the third parameter of "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" is __u32? Yan Zheng
2007-07-26 14:57 ` Yan Zheng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).