From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tytso@mit.edu, john.g.garry@oracle.com, bmarzins@redhat.com,
chaitanyak@nvidia.com, shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com,
brauner@kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com,
yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] block: introduce BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP to queue limits features
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 12:48:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d749264-6fdd-458f-a3a8-35d2320193b3@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250613145433.GF6134@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On 2025/6/13 22:54, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 07:56:30AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 11:15:41AM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
>>> Yeah, this solution looks good to me. However, we currently have only
>>> two selections (none and unmap). What if we keep it as is and simply
>>> hide this interface if BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP is not set, making
>>> it visible only when the device supports this feature? Something like
>>> below:
>>
>> I really hate having all kinds of different interfaces for configurations.
>
> I really hate the open-coded string parsing nonsense that is sysfs. ;)
>
>> Maybe we should redo this similar to the other hardware/software interfaces
>> and have a hw_ limit that is exposed by the driver and re-only in
>> sysfs, and then the user configurable one without _hw. Setting it to
>> zero disables the feature.
>
> Yeah, that fits the /sys/block/foo/queue model better.
>
OK, well. Please let me confirm, are you both suggesting adding
max_hw_write_zeores_unmap_sectors and max_write_zeroes_unmap_sectors to
the queue_limits instead of adding BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP to the
queue_limits->features. Something like the following.
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 378d3a1a22fc..14394850863c 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -376,7 +376,9 @@ struct queue_limits {
unsigned int max_hw_discard_sectors;
unsigned int max_user_discard_sectors;
unsigned int max_secure_erase_sectors;
- unsigned int max_write_zeroes_sectors;
+ unsigned int max_hw_write_zeroes_sectors;
+ unsigned int max_hw_write_zeores_unmap_sectors;
+ unsigned int max_write_zeroes_unmap_sectors;
unsigned int max_hw_zone_append_sectors;
unsigned int max_zone_append_sectors;
unsigned int discard_granularity;
Besides, we should also rename max_write_zeroes_sectors to
max_hw_write_zeroes_sectors since it is a hardware limitation reported
by the driver. If the device supports unmap write zeroes,
max_hw_write_zeores_unmap_sectors should be equal to
max_hw_write_zeroes_sectors, otherwise it should be 0.
Right?
Best regards,
Yi.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-14 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-04 2:08 [PATCH 00/10] fallocate: introduce FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES flag Zhang Yi
2025-06-04 2:08 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: introduce BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP to queue limits features Zhang Yi
2025-06-11 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-11 7:31 ` Zhang Yi
2025-06-12 4:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-12 11:20 ` Zhang Yi
2025-06-12 15:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-13 3:15 ` Zhang Yi
2025-06-13 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-13 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-14 4:48 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2025-06-16 5:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-04 2:08 ` [PATCH 02/10] nvme: set BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP if device supports DEAC bit Zhang Yi
2025-06-04 2:08 ` [PATCH 03/10] nvme-multipath: add BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP support Zhang Yi
2025-06-04 2:08 ` [PATCH 04/10] nvmet: set WZDS and DRB if device supports BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP Zhang Yi
2025-06-04 2:08 ` [PATCH 05/10] scsi: sd: set BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP if device supports unmap zeroing mode Zhang Yi
2025-06-04 2:08 ` [PATCH 06/10] dm: add BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP support Zhang Yi
2025-06-04 2:08 ` [PATCH 07/10] fs: introduce FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES to fallocate Zhang Yi
2025-06-11 15:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-12 11:37 ` Zhang Yi
2025-06-04 2:08 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: factor out common part in blkdev_fallocate() Zhang Yi
2025-06-04 2:08 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: add FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES support Zhang Yi
2025-06-11 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-04 2:08 ` [PATCH 10/10] ext4: " Zhang Yi
2025-06-10 1:47 ` [PATCH 00/10] fallocate: introduce FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES flag Martin K. Petersen
2025-06-16 14:27 ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-16 16:59 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-06-17 2:25 ` Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d749264-6fdd-458f-a3a8-35d2320193b3@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).