Re: [PATCH] inotify: set ret in inotify_read() to -EAGAIN only when O_NONBLOCK is set

[Iman Seyed <imandevel@gmail.com>]

Hi Kuan-Wei,

I just looked over the assembly generated by GCC and Clang
with the O2 level of optimization, and you're right. Both
Generate the identical assembly. It seem like my patch
would only affect the appearance of the code.

Kind Regards,
Iman

On 9/1/24 03:00, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 11:01:50PM -0400, imandevel@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Iman Seyed <ImanDevel@gmail.com>
>>
>> Avoid setting ret to -EAGAIN unnecessarily. Only set
>> it when O_NONBLOCK is specified; otherwise, leave ret
>> unchanged and proceed to set it to -ERESTARTSYS.
>>
> Hi Iman,
>
> Have you checked the code generated by gcc before and after applying
> this patch? My intuition suggests that the compiler optimization might
> result in the same code being produced.
>
> Regards,
> Kuan-Wei
>
>> Signed-off-by: Iman Seyed <ImanDevel@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 6 ++++--
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
>> index 4ffc30606e0b..d5d4b306a33d 100644
>> --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
>> +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
>> @@ -279,9 +279,11 @@ static ssize_t inotify_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>>   			continue;
>>   		}
>>   
>> -		ret = -EAGAIN;
>> -		if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
>> +		if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
>> +			ret = -EAGAIN;
>>   			break;
>> +		}
>> +
>>   		ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
>>   		if (signal_pending(current))
>>   			break;
>> -- 
>> 2.46.0
>>