From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Masover Subject: Re: [benchmark] seek optimization Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:45:27 -0500 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <40F6DED7.3010009@slaphack.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jens Axboe , Bryan Henderson , Guy , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, 'Marcel Hilzinger' , 'Per Olofsson' , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Return-path: Received: from 69-18-53-202.lisco.net ([69.18.53.202]:44730 "EHLO slaphack.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266296AbUGOTpa (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:45:30 -0400 To: Szakacsits Szabolcs In-Reply-To: List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Uh oh. Which scheduler is best for reiser4? Advantages/disadvantages if said scheduler is used with some other fs (UDFfs on CDRWs, anyone?) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQPbe13gHNmZLgCUhAQIdVw//UxiM8Y4XJC1U8h+2whMCYcDhpAsiRkqQ 0aAn8iMzv+QzYSo6uwRCvDy7iyY3PD+Z1t7/DDkFzNsaVoEWH1lg7vE7pYH9z7Vn eS599CvECV10tuf+xg3j8+fJTiiK3YgcjnLqpcUDEa8YEQiXHz75IxhLRORntsyq tcdDW7a8nsDKpdJI2RSrQyPTKjoMDtaREamrQhFC+qLpgorQ5c48uuX7lLMvS0l2 hc6ldI8dN9+5Sl4EtJUF304Z1Prtrqc98p1x80OhkJSqNW0JVG+8bMJ6dfiiwc3y rDdyaSv3HFyCBinEX0GmKyFCXpvwYPbI3D8VtBW7HkSLG0+C4Mv0T2QCtAPE4Axm oyj/N0qf/F3Ydb8z7IJRio80oOKfLU8pvOlLR7FkXfEbAWiFNVUXo2BQuy0O97Hh YgKtXzdvezdVco13/M5JKsm2ghMGK2MrzVs17nV6+b8gBQ2B7o5uQ0ZgJ2MzAD3+ GHcSgGWOX1DEUe+oferVwaCALqsgEp1CFXyzkGzWdHsZ54psEDXKJ9iOarshYe9B vrutQoIrRZ7i3zUhlDR0oeWIrNXHZ9M5HqiqL0fsZhO0WYJ6ukPp5Ru8n41pa4H9 44Ntr5bJni5Tt9BDWwmVOzGcZ+FtERL6QS6ZIZNrCMb9dhj+hnt0EJ+1/IZF+kbo xA+dROthMaQ= =H+gQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----