From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 23:21:29 -0700 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <41395EE9.4040407@namesys.com> References: <200409032145.i83LjdXG002843@localhost.localdomain> <413954B7.7050502@slaphack.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Horst von Brand , Spam , Dave Kleikamp , Paul Jakma , Alan Cox , Jamie Lokier , Linus Torvalds , Adrian Bunk , viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, Christoph Hellwig , fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alexander Lyamin aka FLX , ReiserFS List Return-path: Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85]:61902 "EHLO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269815AbUIDGWI (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Sep 2004 02:22:08 -0400 To: David Masover In-Reply-To: <413954B7.7050502@slaphack.com> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org David Masover wrote: > I used the betas for months, and "metas" > never burned me. metas is much less likely than what clearcase uses to be hit accidentally (After all these years I forget what exactly clearcase special cases, maybe it was "@@"). When people using clearcase suffer a namespace collision, life goes on, no big deal, they structure a filename slightly differently and so what? I mean, just how much do we suffer from not being able to use '/' in filenames? Every once in a while it is annoying, but not that much....