From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erik Latoshek Subject: Re: pseudo-symlinks on directories Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:26:01 +0300 Sender: linux-cifs-client-bounces+glfc-linux-cifs-client=gmane.org@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <417899E9.5050902@hacker.lv> References: <1098412367.6007.12.camel@smfhome1.smfdom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org Return-path: To: linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <1098412367.6007.12.camel@smfhome1.smfdom> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-cifs-client-bounces+glfc-linux-cifs-client=gmane.org@lists.samba.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org maybe we must look at this issue at safety point, when deleting such directories (that look like simple dirs but are links and application cannot know this) we will delete all files inside even directories to which link points. i think that this will be surprising for user, "deleted one directory but lost files in other directories". he cannot know that directory is linked. so i think that even making directory look like not-working link is ok.