From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 20/46] fs: dcache avoid starvation in dcache multi-step operations
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:44:50 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <419734921a2063fb9b103e3c25c08c2e4e71cde7.1290852959.git.npiggin@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1290852958.git.npiggin@kernel.dk>
Long lived dcache "multi-step" operations which retry on rename seq can
be starved with a lot of rename activity. If they fail after the 1st pass,
take the rename_lock for writing to avoid further starvation.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
---
fs/dcache.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index c4b2c5e..73f5552 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -937,10 +937,11 @@ int have_submounts(struct dentry *parent)
struct dentry *this_parent;
struct list_head *next;
unsigned seq;
+ int locked = 0;
-rename_retry:
- this_parent = parent;
seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
+again:
+ this_parent = parent;
if (d_mountpoint(parent))
goto positive;
@@ -985,7 +986,7 @@ resume:
/* might go back up the wrong parent if we have had a rename
* or deletion */
if (this_parent != child->d_parent ||
- read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq)) {
+ (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))) {
spin_unlock(&this_parent->d_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
goto rename_retry;
@@ -995,13 +996,22 @@ resume:
goto resume;
}
spin_unlock(&this_parent->d_lock);
- if (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
+ if (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
goto rename_retry;
+ if (locked)
+ write_sequnlock(&rename_lock);
return 0; /* No mount points found in tree */
positive:
- if (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
+ if (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
goto rename_retry;
+ if (locked)
+ write_sequnlock(&rename_lock);
return 1;
+
+rename_retry:
+ locked = 1;
+ write_seqlock(&rename_lock);
+ goto again;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(have_submounts);
@@ -1025,11 +1035,11 @@ static int select_parent(struct dentry * parent)
struct list_head *next;
unsigned seq;
int found = 0;
+ int locked = 0;
-rename_retry:
- this_parent = parent;
seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
-
+again:
+ this_parent = parent;
spin_lock(&this_parent->d_lock);
repeat:
next = this_parent->d_subdirs.next;
@@ -1091,7 +1101,7 @@ resume:
/* might go back up the wrong parent if we have had a rename
* or deletion */
if (this_parent != child->d_parent ||
- read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq)) {
+ (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))) {
spin_unlock(&this_parent->d_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
goto rename_retry;
@@ -1102,9 +1112,18 @@ resume:
}
out:
spin_unlock(&this_parent->d_lock);
- if (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
+ if (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
goto rename_retry;
+ if (locked)
+ write_sequnlock(&rename_lock);
return found;
+
+rename_retry:
+ if (found)
+ return found;
+ locked = 1;
+ write_seqlock(&rename_lock);
+ goto again;
}
/**
@@ -2602,10 +2621,11 @@ void d_genocide(struct dentry *root)
struct dentry *this_parent;
struct list_head *next;
unsigned seq;
+ int locked = 0;
-rename_retry:
- this_parent = root;
seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
+again:
+ this_parent = root;
spin_lock(&this_parent->d_lock);
repeat:
next = this_parent->d_subdirs.next;
@@ -2650,7 +2670,7 @@ resume:
/* might go back up the wrong parent if we have had a rename
* or deletion */
if (this_parent != child->d_parent ||
- read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq)) {
+ (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))) {
spin_unlock(&this_parent->d_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
goto rename_retry;
@@ -2660,8 +2680,16 @@ resume:
goto resume;
}
spin_unlock(&this_parent->d_lock);
- if (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
+ if (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
goto rename_retry;
+ if (locked)
+ write_sequnlock(&rename_lock);
+ return;
+
+rename_retry:
+ locked = 1;
+ write_seqlock(&rename_lock);
+ goto again;
}
/**
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-27 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-27 10:15 [PATCH 00/46] rcu-walk and dcache scaling Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 02/46] fs: d_validate fixes Nick Piggin
2010-12-08 1:53 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08 6:59 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 0:50 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 4:50 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 03/46] kernel: kmem_ptr_validate considered harmful Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 04/46] fs: dcache documentation cleanup Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 05/46] fs: change d_delete semantics Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 06/46] cifs: dont overwrite dentry name in d_revalidate Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 07/46] jfs: " Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 08/46] fs: change d_compare for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 09/46] fs: change d_hash " Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 10/46] hostfs: simplify locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 11/46] fs: dcache scale hash Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 6:09 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 6:28 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 8:17 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 12:53 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 23:42 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-10 2:35 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-10 9:01 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-13 4:48 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-13 5:05 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 12/46] fs: dcache scale lru Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 7:22 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 12:34 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 13/46] fs: dcache scale dentry refcount Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 14/46] fs: dcache scale d_unhashed Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 15/46] fs: dcache scale subdirs Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 16/46] fs: scale inode alias list Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 17/46] fs: Use rename lock and RCU for multi-step operations Nick Piggin
2011-01-18 22:32 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-01-18 22:42 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-19 22:27 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-01-19 22:32 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25 22:10 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-01-27 5:18 ` Nick Piggin
2011-02-07 18:52 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-07 21:04 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-02-07 21:31 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-07 22:25 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-14 17:57 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 18/46] fs: increase d_name lock coverage Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 19/46] fs: dcache remove dcache_lock Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 21/46] fs: dcache reduce dput locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 22/46] fs: dcache reduce locking in d_alloc Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 23/46] fs: dcache reduce dcache_inode_lock Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 24/46] fs: dcache rationalise dget variants Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 25/46] fs: dcache reduce d_parent locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 26/46] fs: dcache reduce prune_one_dentry locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 27/46] fs: reduce dcache_inode_lock width in lru scanning Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 28/46] fs: use RCU in shrink_dentry_list to reduce lock nesting Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 29/46] fs: consolidate dentry kill sequence Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 30/46] fs: icache RCU free inodes Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 31/46] fs: avoid inode RCU freeing for pseudo fs Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 32/46] kernel: optimise seqlock Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 33/46] fs: rcu-walk for path lookup Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 34/46] fs: fs_struct use seqlock Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 35/46] fs: dcache remove d_mounted Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 36/46] fs: dcache reduce branches in lookup path Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 37/46] fs: cache optimise dentry and inode for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 38/46] fs: prefetch inode data in dcache lookup Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 39/46] fs: d_revalidate_rcu for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 40/46] fs: provide rcu-walk aware permission i_ops Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 41/46] fs: provide simple rcu-walk ACL implementation Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 42/46] kernel: add bl_list Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 43/46] bit_spinlock: add required includes Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 44/46] fs: dcache per-bucket dcache hash locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 45/46] fs: dcache per-inode inode alias locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 46/46] fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:56 ` [PATCH 01/46] Revert "fs: use RCU read side protection in d_validate" Nick Piggin
2010-12-08 1:16 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08 9:38 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 0:44 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 4:38 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 5:16 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 15:04 ` [PATCH 00/46] rcu-walk and dcache scaling Anca Emanuel
2010-11-28 3:28 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-28 6:24 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-12-01 18:03 ` David Miller
2010-12-03 16:55 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 11:25 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-07 15:24 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-07 15:59 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 16:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 3:28 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 21:56 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08 1:47 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-08 3:32 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08 4:28 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08 7:09 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-10 20:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-12 14:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=419734921a2063fb9b103e3c25c08c2e4e71cde7.1290852959.git.npiggin@kernel.dk \
--to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).