From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Sorenson Subject: Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:16:27 -0600 Message-ID: <425BE64B.7040801@tuxrocks.com> References: <20050411114728.GA13128@infradead.org> <20050411153619.GA25987@nevyn.them.org> <20050411181717.GA1129@nevyn.them.org> <20050411192223.GA3707@nevyn.them.org> <20050411214123.GF32535@mail.shareable.org> <20050412143347.GC10995@mail.shareable.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Miklos Szeredi , dan@debian.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk Return-path: To: Jamie Lokier In-Reply-To: <20050412143347.GC10995@mail.shareable.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jamie Lokier wrote: > That does not make sense. > > Are you saying you cannot trust your own sshfs userspace daemon? The user who wrote the userspace code may be able to, but the system shouldn't trust the userspace daemon. Permissions will be enforced by the ssh server. Frank - -- Frank Sorenson - KD7TZK Systems Manager, Computer Science Department Brigham Young University frank@tuxrocks.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCW+ZLaI0dwg4A47wRAnDVAKCb2Hk39ouYkjEDgTlz+RTsPsAn5QCgpKvZ rfYjOi+x6+RSie+t8GIxX74= =qShM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----