From: Carsten Otte <cotte@freenet.de>
To: suparna@in.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:09:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42930B64.2060105@freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050524093029.GA4390@in.ibm.com>
Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
>On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:30:20PM +0200, Carsten Otte wrote:
>
>
>>diff -ruN linux-git/mm/filemap.h linux-git-xip/mm/filemap.h
>>--- linux-git/mm/filemap.h 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
>>+++ linux-git-xip/mm/filemap.h 2005-05-23 19:01:27.000000000 +0200
>>@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
>>+/*
>>+ * linux/mm/filemap.c
>>+ *
>>
>>
>
>I guess you meant "filemap.h" not "filemap.c" ? Shouldn't this be
>in include/linux instead ?
>
>
Yea, Andrew Morton fixed this one while merging into -mm. Cut&Paste - sorry
> OK, though this leaves filemap.c alone which is good, I have to admit
>
>that this entire duplication of read/write routines really worries me.
>
>There has to be a third way.
>
>
Well those carbon copied functions are -as Christoph pointed out- just
wrappers. In addition,
we don't have sync read/write, just aio_read/aio_write, readv/writev,
and sendfile.
We saved almost as much patches to filemap.c as we have added stuff to
filemap_xip:
cotte@cotte:~/patches$ cat v2/linux-2.6-xip-2-filemap.patch |wc -l
789
cotte@cotte:~/patches$ cat v3/linux-2.6-xip-2-filemap.patch |wc -l
868
Given that the copied wrappers add just 80 lines after all, I agree with
Christoph that this is
worth buying reduced complexity for.
cheers,
Carsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-24 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1116866094.12153.12.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
2005-05-23 17:30 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version) Carsten Otte
2005-05-24 9:30 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-05-24 10:28 ` Jörn Engel
2005-05-24 11:09 ` Carsten Otte [this message]
2005-05-24 13:32 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-05-24 14:34 ` Carsten Otte
2005-05-25 17:51 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-05-26 13:22 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-05-26 13:19 ` Carsten Otte
2005-05-26 16:43 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-05-26 13:29 ` Carsten Otte
2005-05-28 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-24 17:01 ` Carsten Otte
2005-05-28 9:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-23 17:30 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/4] ext2: " Carsten Otte
2005-05-23 17:30 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/4] madvice/fadvice: " Carsten Otte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42930B64.2060105@freenet.de \
--to=cotte@freenet.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).