From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Otte Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version) Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 15:19:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4295CCDF.9070302@freenet.de> References: <1116866094.12153.12.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <1116869420.12153.32.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20050524093029.GA4390@in.ibm.com> <42930B64.2060105@freenet.de> <20050524133211.GA4896@in.ibm.com> <42933B7A.3060206@freenet.de> <1117043475.26913.1540.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> <20050526132251.GA5067@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Badari Pulavarty , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([194.97.50.132]:35519 "EHLO mout1.freenet.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261324AbVEZNUt (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2005 09:20:49 -0400 To: suparna@in.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20050526132251.GA5067@in.ibm.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Suparna Bhattacharya wrote: > To get a complete picture, how did you want to handle direct io ? > >Regards >Suparna > > Just through the regular xip path, O_DIRECT doesn't have any effect on those files since we do a direct memcpy to disk in the end anyway. That has the user-visible effect that unalligned reads/writes work with O_DIRECT.