From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Anzinger Subject: Re: [PATCH] Full NLS support for HFS (classic) filesystem Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:47:56 -0700 Message-ID: <42A8D52C.701@mvista.com> References: <429B1E35.2040905@rambler.ru> Reply-To: george@mvista.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pavel Fedin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:42233 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262446AbVFIXsu (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:48:50 -0400 To: Roman Zippel In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 30 May 2005, Pavel Fedin wrote: > > > (BTW please try to inline the patch otherwise it's rather difficult to > quote from it.) I, for one, fine the attachment better. Especially as he has a signature mark at the end of his comments. On my mailer (Mozilla) the attachment is inlined after the message and comes up in the reply window. If it is inlined after the signature mark it is both half bright in the original message and does NOT come up in the reply. So confusing as to how and which mailer to use... -- George Anzinger george@mvista.com HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/