linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@loongson.cn>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Christian Brauner (Microsoft)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	maobibo <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: block: sleeping in atomic warnings
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:31:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4321724d-9a24-926c-5d2d-5d5d902bda72@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+Ja5SRs886CEz7a@kadam>

On 2/7/23 7:06?AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> block/blk-mq.c:206 blk_freeze_queue() warn: sleeping in atomic context
> rexmit_timer() <- disables preempt
> -> aoedev_downdev()
>    -> blk_mq_freeze_queue()
>       -> blk_freeze_queue()

That is definitely a legit bug, aoe should punt to a workqueue or
similar.

> block/blk-mq.c:4083 blk_mq_destroy_queue() warn: sleeping in atomic context
> nvme_fc_match_disconn_ls() <- disables preempt
> -> nvme_fc_ctrl_put()
>    -> nvme_fc_ctrl_free()
>       -> nvme_remove_admin_tag_set()
> nvme_fc_ctrl_free() <duplicate>
> -> nvme_remove_io_tag_set()
>          -> blk_mq_destroy_queue()

Also looks like a legitimate bug.

> block/blk-mq.c:2174 __blk_mq_run_hw_queue() warn: sleeping in atomic context
> __blk_mq_run_hw_queue() <duplicate>
> -> blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests()
>    -> __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests()
>       -> blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched()
> blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched() <duplicate>
> -> __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched()
>    -> blk_mq_dispatch_hctx_list()
> __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched() <duplicate>
> __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests() <duplicate>
> -> blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx()
> __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests() <duplicate>
>       -> blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list()
> __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched() <duplicate>
> blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx() <duplicate>
> -> blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues()
>          -> blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue()

This one I'm not really following... Would it be possible to expand the
reporting to be a bit more verbose?

> sg_remove_sfp_usercontext() <- disables preempt
> block/blk-wbt.c:843 wbt_init() warn: sleeping in atomic context
> ioc_qos_write() <- disables preempt
> -> wbt_enable_default()
>    -> wbt_init()

Also definitely a bug.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-07 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-29  6:04 [PATCH v4] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock Hongchen Zhang
2023-01-29  7:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-03  2:24   ` Hongchen Zhang
2023-02-06 15:58   ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-06 16:07     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-06 16:13     ` Julia Lawall
2023-02-06 16:45       ` Dan Carpenter
2023-02-06 17:54         ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-07  7:02           ` Dan Carpenter
2023-02-06 18:25         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-07 13:37         ` xen: sleeping in atomic warnings Dan Carpenter
2023-02-07 14:03           ` Juergen Gross
2023-02-07 14:06       ` block: " Dan Carpenter
2023-02-07 16:15         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-07 17:53           ` Eric Biggers
2023-02-07 18:24             ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-07 18:36               ` Eric Biggers
2023-02-07 18:57                 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-07 19:09                   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-07 19:35                   ` Eric Biggers
2023-02-07 19:49                     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-08  6:53                     ` Eric Biggers
2023-02-07 18:31         ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-02-08  3:15           ` Yu Kuai
2023-02-03  1:42 ` [PATCH v4] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock Hongchen Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4321724d-9a24-926c-5d2d-5d5d902bda72@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zhanghongchen@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).