From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: fscache review comments, part 1
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:38:09 +0100
Message-ID: <4323.1159519089@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
References: <20060928164529.GA3497@infradead.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:48041 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161410AbWI2IiU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:38:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20060928164529.GA3497@infradead.org> 
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> 	Why is this patch required for fscache anyway?

It's not, it's just there in my patchset because that's where I developed it.
I should probably drop it from there as Andrew is now carrying it.

> 	(and why is it last in the series then?)

Because it is.

David