From: Janak Desai <janak@us.ibm.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: chrisw@osdl.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New System call unshare (try 2)
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:17:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <434D533C.6030901@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051012171914.GA8622@mail.shareable.org>
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Janak Desai wrote:
>
>> Don't allow namespace unsharing, if sharing fs (CLONE_FS)
>
>
> Makes sense. clone() has the same test at the start. (I think
> namespace should be a property of fs, not task, anyway. Or completely
> eliminated because it's implied by the task's root dentry+vfsmnt).
>
>
>> Don't allow sighand unsharing if not unsharing vm
>
>
> Why not? It's permitted to clone with unshared sighand and shared vm,
> and it's useful too.
>
> It's the combination shared sighand + unshared vm which is not
> allowed by clone - so I think that's what you should refuse.
>
Yes, thanks. I had that backwards. I am checking for the illegal
combination of "shared sighand + unshared vm" later but I will
allow (and test) unsharing of sighand while keeping shared vm.
>
>> Don't allow vm unsharing if task cloned with CLONE_THREAD
>
>
> It would be better to do what clone does, and say "don't allow sighand
> unsharing if task cloned with CLONE_THREAD". This is because
> CLONE_THREAD tasks must have shared signals.
>
> In combination with the rule above for sighand (my rule, not yours),
> that implies "don't allow vm unsharing.." as a consequence.
>
Ok. Basically, with my current logic you are forced to unshare
both vm and sighand. I will update so you can unshare just sighand
and tie the CLONE_THREAD restriction to sighand.
>
>> Don't allow vm unsharing if the task is performing async io
>
>
> Why not?
>
> Async ios are tied to an mm (see lookup_ioctx in fs/aio.c), which may
> be shared among tasks. I see no reason why the async ios can't
> continue and be waited in on in other tasks that may be using the old mm.
>
> The new mm, if vm is unshared, would simply not see the outstanding
> aios - in the same way as if a vm was unshared by fork().
>
Yes, I did see that async ios are tied to an mm and that aio context is
cleared when a new mm is created by clone/exec. It just appeared odd to
me that a task that setup aio is unable to continue performing aio
after unsharing mm, but the task that it was sharing mm with, can. I
don't have any problem making this change. It's just that I wasn't sure
about aio usage and thought it was better to not allow an mm unshare if
aio is being performed.
-Janak
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-12 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-12 16:07 [PATCH] New System call unshare (try 2) Janak Desai
2005-10-12 17:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-10-12 18:17 ` Janak Desai [this message]
2005-10-12 23:54 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-10-13 10:13 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-13 13:27 ` Janak Desai
2005-10-13 9:58 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-13 10:11 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=434D533C.6030901@us.ibm.com \
--to=janak@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).